Literature DB >> 24305609

Shortened penis post penile prosthesis implantation treated with subcutaneous soft silicone penile implant: case report.

V Shirvanian1, G Lemperle2, C Araujo Pinto3, J J Elist.   

Abstract

Penile prosthesis surgery for erectile dysfunction has the highest satisfaction rates among all treatment options but is often associated with subjective and objective loss of penile length and girth following surgery. To present a novel technique using a subcutaneous soft silicone implant for reversal of penile shortening and narrowing after prosthesis surgery, with additional gains in overall penile length and girth. Nine patients were treated with the insertion of a subcutaneous soft silicone penile implant. All patients had previously reported a loss in penile length (0.5-2 cm), and seven of nine patients also reported a loss in penile girth (0.5-2.6 cm) after penile prosthesis surgery. During a follow-up period of 4-24 months, penile length and girth measurements showed a mean increase in length of 2.4 cm (±0.75 cm) and a mean increase in girth of 3.4 cm (±0.94 cm). The additional insertion of a subcutaneous soft silicone implant in patients with decreased penile length and girth after penile prosthesis surgery is an effective treatment option that provides reversal of lost penile length and girth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24305609     DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2013.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: what practices achieve the best outcomes and the lowest infection rates? (CME).

Authors:  Peter R Hinds; Steven K Wilson; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Comparison of a new length measurement technique for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to standard techniques: outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Gerard Henry; Laura Houghton; Daniel Culkin; Juan Otheguy; Ridwan Shabsigh; Dana A Ohl
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study.

Authors:  C B Johannes; A B Araujo; H A Feldman; C A Derby; K P Kleinman; J B McKinlay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  John P Mulhall; Absaar Ahmed; Jeffrey Branch; Marilyn Parker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures.

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; David J Ralph; John P Pryor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Edouard Amar; Ian Eardley; Francois Giuliano; Dimitrios Hatzichristou; Francesco Montorsi; Yoram Vardi; Eric Wespes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Serkan Deveci; David Martin; Marilyn Parker; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient.

Authors:  Landon W Trost; Neil Baum; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Increasing size with penile implants.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague; Kenneth W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection.

Authors:  Run Wang; Galen E Howard; Anthony Hoang; Jiu-Hong Yuan; Hao-Cheng Lin; Yu-Tian Dai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.