Literature DB >> 27557609

Satisfaction assessment with malleable prosthetic implant of Spectra (AMS) and Genesis (Coloplast) models.

A R Casabé1,2, N Sarotto1, C Gutierrez1, A J Bechara1,2.   

Abstract

The malleable prosthetic implant is widely accepted among patients and physicians owing to a lower degree of surgical complexity, its rare mechanic failures and lower cost. We have compared the degree of satisfaction with malleable prosthetic implant in 60 patients, 36 with Spectra (AMS) and 24 with Genesis (Coloplast). For assessment purposes, we implemented the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) satisfaction questionnaire adapted for penile prosthetic implants. The mean age and follow-up was 61.7 years (31-82) and 19.9 months (1-61), respectively. Mean EDITS scores did not indicate superiority of one implant over the other, overall satisfaction index being 77.1% and 75.6% for Genesis and Spectra prosthesis, respectively (P=0.4970). Our results revealed that these two models of malleable prostheses present a high level of satisfaction and confirm that the malleable prosthetic implant is an excellent option to treat patients with ED refractory to medical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27557609     DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2016.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  18 in total

1.  Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  John P Mulhall; Absaar Ahmed; Jeffrey Branch; Marilyn Parker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  S E Althof; E W Corty; S B Levine; F Levine; A L Burnett; K McVary; V Stecher; A D Seftel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study.

Authors:  L A Levine; C R Estrada; A Morgentaler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Surgical Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Eduardo B Bertero; Dimas L Antunes
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2015-11-10

5.  Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.

Authors:  Alessandro Natali; Roberto Olianas; Margit Fisch
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East--is it different from that reported elsewhere?

Authors:  N Salama
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli; Lucia Divenuto; Francesca Fortunato; Antonio Falco; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Gabriele Antonini; Vincenzo Gentile; Alessandro Sciarra; Stefano Salciccia; Salvatore Sansalone; Maria Rosaria Di Placido; Giulio Garaffa; Arcangelo Pagliarulo
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2013-09-26

8.  A new treatment for Peyronie's disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  S K Wilson; J R Delk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice.

Authors:  Atul Rajpurkar; Chirpriya B Dhabuwala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Raymond M Bernal; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-26
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Justin Parker; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Can malleable penile prosthesis implantation improve voiding dysfunction in men with concurrent erectile dysfunction and buried penis?

Authors:  Eric Chung; Brian Ng Hung Shin; Juan Wang
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 3.  Role of Penile Prosthesis in Priapism: A Review.

Authors:  Amit G Reddy; Laith M Alzweri; Andrew T Gabrielson; Gabriel Leinwand; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 4.  Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-02

5.  The importance of the malleable implant salvage technique (MIST) in modern prosthetic urology.

Authors:  Alex Tatem; Jason R Kovac
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

6.  [Quality of life in patients who suffered erectile dysfunction and underwent penile implant surgery in terms of sexual satisfaction of the patient and partner].

Authors:  K-M Arndt; A Chomicz; K-P Jünemann; D Osmonov
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Modified malleable prosthesis with a fixed mesh: case series for the Ghattas technique.

Authors:  Osama Ghattas; Mohamed Fahmy Doheim; Hossam Kotb; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.