Literature DB >> 34061221

[The "right" patient for implant surgery in urology : Why patient selection, informed consent, and communication are so important for patient satisfaction].

C Leiber1, A Katzenwadel2, D Schlager2.   

Abstract

In implant surgery for erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, adequate patient selection is essential for postoperative therapy success. Several scientific studies report patient satisfaction rates for penile implants and artificial urinary sphincter implantation of over 90%. Nevertheless, studies also report, that between 5 and 30% of the patients are not satisfied with the result of their operation. Sufficient patient information and consent prior surgical procedure in urological prosthetics are a key determinant for later patient satisfaction and therapy success. Diligent assessment of realistic expectations, possible complications, and risks must be made. Unrealistic and exaggerated expectations need to be met and discussed with the patient. Therefore adequate physician-patient communication is essential. Especially in the case of surgical revision or for patients with risk factors, the probability of complications is higher and may significantly increase later dissatisfaction. Also, the involvement of the partner plays a major role in later patient satisfaction in urological implant surgery. Finally, there is a group of patients for which the risk of later dissatisfaction is particularly high. These are patients with compulsive/obsessive behavior, unrealistic expectations, patients after revision surgery, self-entitled patients, as well as those patients who deny the extent of their illness, visit multiple surgeons (surgeon hopping) or have psychiatric illnesses. These patients are referred to with the acronym "CURSED" patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial sphincter; Erectile dysfunction; Mental disorders; Penile prosthesis; Urinary incontinence

Year:  2021        PMID: 34061221     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01546-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Ricarda M Bauer; Christian Gozzi; Wilhelm Hübner; Victor W Nitti; Giacomo Novara; Andrew Peterson; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Long-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Mitra de Cogain; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Mid-term results for the retroluminar transobturator sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ricarda M Bauer; Irina Soljanik; Claudius Füllhase; Alexander Karl; Armin Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses for satisfaction.

Authors:  Mary Jo Brinkman; Gerard D Henry; Steven K Wilson; John R Delk; George A Denny; Michael Young; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Does a replacement or revision of an inflatable penile prosthesis lead to decreased patient satisfaction?

Authors:  A A Caire; A Boonjindasup; W J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter Rehder; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Matt Solomon; Ling DeYoung; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Wayne J G Hellstrom; Drogo K Montague; Ignacio Moncada; Culley Carson; Suks Minhas; Geraldo Faria; Sudhakar Krishnamurti
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient.

Authors:  Landon W Trost; Neil Baum; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Artificial urinary sphincter: long-term results and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.