Literature DB >> 23550766

Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nathaniel P Sharp1, Aneil F Agrawal.   

Abstract

In populations with males and females, sexual selection may often represent a major component of overall selection. Sexual selection could act to eliminate deleterious alleles in concert with other forms of selection, thereby improving the fitness of sexual populations. Alternatively, the divergent reproductive strategies of the sexes could promote the maintenance of sexually antagonistic variation, causing sexual populations to be less fit. The net impact of sexual selection on fitness is not well understood, due in part to limited data on the sex-specific effects of spontaneous mutations on total fitness. Using a set of mutation accumulation lines of Drosophila melanogaster, we found that mutations were deleterious in both sexes and had larger effects on fitness in males than in females. This pattern is expected to reduce the mutation load of sexual females and promote the maintenance of sexual reproduction.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23550766     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  29 in total

1.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  An experimental test of the mutation-selection balance model for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness components.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Local adaptation and the evolution of inversions on sex chromosomes and autosomes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Colin Olito; Ludovic Dutoit; Homa Papoli; Filip Ruzicka; Lengxob Yong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sexual antagonism for resistance and tolerance to infection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Crystal M Vincent; Nathaniel P Sharp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.