Literature DB >> 25649503

The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

N P Sharp1, C M Vincent2.   

Abstract

The life history strategies of males and females are often divergent, creating the potential for sex differences in selection. Deleterious mutations may be subject to stronger selection in males, owing to sexual selection, which can improve the mean fitness of females and reduce mutation load in sexual populations. However, sex differences in selection might also maintain sexually antagonistic genetic variation, creating a sexual conflict load. The overall impact of separate sexes on fitness is unclear, but the net effect is likely to be positive when there is a large sex difference in selection against deleterious mutations. Parasites can also have sex-specific effects on fitness, and there is evidence that parasites can intensify the fitness consequences of deleterious mutations. Using lines that accumulated mutations for over 60 generations, we studied the effect of the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa on sex differences in selection in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Pseudomonas infection increased the sex difference in selection, but may also have weakened the intersexual correlation for fitness. Our results suggest that parasites may increase the benefits of sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25649503      PMCID: PMC4359975          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  37 in total

1.  Differential selection between the sexes and selection for sex.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; Donna Petfield; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Robert M Cox; Ryan Calsbeek
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  R S Howard; C M Lively
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Jessica M Bouchard; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sean C A Clark; Nathaniel P Sharp; Locke Rowe; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster hosts coevolving with Pseudomonas entomophila pathogen show sex-specific patterns of local adaptation.

Authors:  Neetika Ahlawat; Manas Geeta Arun; Komal Maggu; Aparajita Singh; Nagaraj Guru Prasad
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-18

2.  The evolution of monogamy is associated with reversals from male to female bias in the survival cost of parasitism.

Authors:  Tyler N Wittman; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Experimental evolution reveals sex-specific dominance for surviving bacterial infection in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Manas Geeta Arun; Amisha Agarwala; Zeeshan Ali Syed; Mayank Kashyap; Saudamini Venkatesan; Tejinder Singh Chechi; Vanika Gupta; Nagaraj Guru Prasad
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2021-10-14

4.  Investigating the interaction between inter-locus and intra-locus sexual conflict using hemiclonal analysis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rakesh Meena; Shradha Dattaraya Bhosle; Manas Geeta Arun; Tejinder Singh Chechi; Nagaraj Guru Prasad
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.