Literature DB >> 23548462

Cervical intraspinal microstimulation evokes robust forelimb movements before and after injury.

Michael D Sunshine1, Frances S Cho, Danielle R Lockwood, Amber S Fechko, Michael R Kasten, Chet T Moritz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) is a promising method for reanimating paralyzed limbs following neurological injury. ISMS within the cervical and lumbar spinal cord is capable of evoking a variety of highly-functional movements prior to injury, but the ability of ISMS to evoke forelimb movements after cervical spinal cord injury is unknown. Here we examine the forelimb movements and muscles activated by cervical ISMS both before and after contusion injury. APPROACH: We documented the forelimb muscles activated and movements evoked via systematic stimulation of the rodent cervical spinal cord both before injury and three, six and nine weeks following a moderate C4/C5 lateralized contusion injury. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane to permit construction of somatotopic maps of evoked movements and quantify evoked muscle synergies between cervical segments C3 and T1. MAIN
RESULTS: When ISMS was delivered to the cervical spinal cord, a variety of responses were observed at 68% of locations tested, with a spatial distribution that generally corresponded to the location of motor neuron pools. Stimulus currents required to achieve movement and the number of sites where movements could be evoked were unchanged by spinal cord injury. A transient shift toward extension-dominated movements and restricted muscle synergies were observed at three and six weeks following injury, respectively. By nine weeks after injury, however, ISMS-evoked patterns were similar to spinally-intact animals. SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate the potential for cervical ISMS to reanimate hand and arm function following spinal cord injury. Robust forelimb movements can be evoked both before and during the chronic stages of recovery from a clinically relevant and sustained cervical contusion injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548462      PMCID: PMC3732065          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  26 in total

1.  CNS plasticity and assessment of forelimb sensorimotor outcome in unilateral rat models of stroke, cortical ablation, parkinsonism and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Schallert; S M Fleming; J L Leasure; J L Tillerson; S T Bland
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Responses to spinal microstimulation in the chronically spinalized rat and their relationship to spinal systems activated by low threshold cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  M C Tresch; E Bizzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Movements generated by intraspinal microstimulation in the intermediate gray matter of the anesthetized, decerebrate, and spinal cat.

Authors:  V K Mushahwar; Y Aoyagi; R B Stein; A Prochazka
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.273

4.  Intraspinal microstimulation preferentially recruits fatigue-resistant muscle fibres and generates gradual force in rat.

Authors:  J A Bamford; C T Putman; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Intraspinal microstimulation excites multisegmental sensory afferents at lower stimulus levels than local alpha-motoneuron responses.

Authors:  R A Gaunt; A Prochazka; V K Mushahwar; L Guevremont; P H Ellaway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Forelimb movements and muscle responses evoked by microstimulation of cervical spinal cord in sedated monkeys.

Authors:  Chet T Moritz; Timothy H Lucas; Steve I Perlmutter; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Compartmentalization in the triceps brachii motoneuron nucleus and its relation to muscle architecture.

Authors:  Ana M Lucas-Osma; Jorge E Collazos-Castro
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Muscle plasticity in rat following spinal transection and chronic intraspinal microstimulation.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Charles T Putman; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Spatial characterization of the motor neuron columns supplying the rat forelimb.

Authors:  A P Tosolini; R Morris
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Reanimating the arm and hand with intraspinal microstimulation.

Authors:  Jonas B Zimmermann; Kazuhiko Seki; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  32 in total

1.  Upper-limb muscle responses to epidural, subdural and intraspinal stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Abigail N Sharpe; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Electrical neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord facilitates forelimb skilled function recovery in spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Benita Jin; Jonathan Keyes; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko; Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Intraspinal microstimulation for respiratory muscle activation.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Comron N Ganji; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 4.  Enhancing neural activity to drive respiratory plasticity following cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kristiina M Hormigo; Lyandysha V Zholudeva; Victoria M Spruance; Vitaliy Marchenko; Marie-Pascale Cote; Stephane Vinit; Simon Giszter; Tatiana Bezdudnaya; Michael A Lane
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Intraspinal microstimulation and diaphragm activation after cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  L M Mercier; E J Gonzalez-Rothi; K A Streeter; S S Posgai; A S Poirier; D D Fuller; P J Reier; D M Baekey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A Cervical Hemi-Contusion Spinal Cord Injury Model for the Investigation of Novel Therapeutics Targeting Proximal and Distal Forelimb Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Sarah E Mondello; Michael D Sunshine; Amanda E Fischedick; Chet T Moritz; Philip J Horner
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Regenerative Rehabilitation: Combining Stem Cell Therapies and Activity-Dependent Stimulation.

Authors:  Chet T Moritz; Fabrisia Ambrosio
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.049

8.  Respiratory resetting elicited by single pulse spinal stimulation.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Comron N Ganji; David D Fuller; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.931

9.  Evaluation of optimal electrode configurations for epidural spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Prithvi K Shah; Yury Gerasimenko; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  M R Kasten; M D Sunshine; E S Secrist; P J Horner; C T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.