Monzurul Alam1, Guillermo Garcia-Alias2, Prithvi K Shah3, Yury Gerasimenko4, Hui Zhong2, Roland R Roy5, V Reggie Edgerton6. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. 2. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. 3. Health &Technology and Neurobiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States. 4. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Pavlov Institute of Physiology, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia; Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420006, Russia. 5. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. 6. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. Electronic address: vre@ucla.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidural spinal cord stimulation is a promising technique for modulating the level of excitability and reactivation of dormant spinal neuronal circuits after spinal cord injury (SCI). We examined the ability of chronically implanted epidural stimulation electrodes within the cervical spinal cord to (1) directly elicit spinal motor evoked potentials (sMEPs) in forelimb muscles and (2) determine whether these sMEPs can serve as a biomarker of forelimb motor function after SCI. NEW METHOD: We implanted EMG electrodes in forelimb muscles and epidural stimulation electrodes at C6 and C8 in adult rats. After recovering from a dorsal funiculi crush (C4), rats were tested with different stimulation configurations and current intensities to elicit sMEPs and determined forelimb grip strength. RESULTS: sMEPs were evoked in all muscles tested and their characteristics were dependent on electrode configurations and current intensities. C6(-) stimulation elicited more robust sMEPs than stimulation at C8(-). Stimulating C6 and C8 simultaneously produced better muscle recruitment and higher grip strengths than stimulation at one site. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Classical method to select the most optimal stimulation configuration is to empirically test each combination individually for every subject and relate to functional improvements. This approach is impractical, requiring extensively long experimental time to determine the more effective stimulation parameters. Our proposed method is fast and physiologically sound. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that sMEPs from forelimb muscles can be useful biomarkers for identifying optimal parameters for epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord after SCI.
BACKGROUND: Epidural spinal cord stimulation is a promising technique for modulating the level of excitability and reactivation of dormant spinal neuronal circuits after spinal cord injury (SCI). We examined the ability of chronically implanted epidural stimulation electrodes within the cervical spinal cord to (1) directly elicit spinal motor evoked potentials (sMEPs) in forelimb muscles and (2) determine whether these sMEPs can serve as a biomarker of forelimb motor function after SCI. NEW METHOD: We implanted EMG electrodes in forelimb muscles and epidural stimulation electrodes at C6 and C8 in adult rats. After recovering from a dorsal funiculi crush (C4), rats were tested with different stimulation configurations and current intensities to elicit sMEPs and determined forelimb grip strength. RESULTS:sMEPs were evoked in all muscles tested and their characteristics were dependent on electrode configurations and current intensities. C6(-) stimulation elicited more robust sMEPs than stimulation at C8(-). Stimulating C6 and C8 simultaneously produced better muscle recruitment and higher grip strengths than stimulation at one site. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Classical method to select the most optimal stimulation configuration is to empirically test each combination individually for every subject and relate to functional improvements. This approach is impractical, requiring extensively long experimental time to determine the more effective stimulation parameters. Our proposed method is fast and physiologically sound. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that sMEPs from forelimb muscles can be useful biomarkers for identifying optimal parameters for epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord after SCI.
Authors: Yury P Gerasimenko; Igor A Lavrov; Gregoire Courtine; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Christine J Dy; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2006-06-09 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Susan Harkema; Yury Gerasimenko; Jonathan Hodes; Joel Burdick; Claudia Angeli; Yangsheng Chen; Christie Ferreira; Andrea Willhite; Enrico Rejc; Robert G Grossman; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gregoire Courtine; Bingbing Song; Roland R Roy; Hui Zhong; Julia E Herrmann; Yan Ao; Jingwei Qi; V Reggie Edgerton; Michael V Sofroniew Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-01-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Benita Jin; Jonathan Keyes; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko; Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton; Morteza Modaber; Nicholas AuYong; Erika Morikawa; Sharon Zdunowski; Melanie E Sarino; Majid Sarrafzadeh; Marc R Nuwer; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Matthew K Hogan; Sean M Barber; Zhoulyu Rao; Bethany R Kondiles; Meng Huang; William J Steele; Cunjiang Yu; Philip J Horner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 4.379