Literature DB >> 16971685

Forelimb movements and muscle responses evoked by microstimulation of cervical spinal cord in sedated monkeys.

Chet T Moritz1, Timothy H Lucas, Steve I Perlmutter, Eberhard E Fetz.   

Abstract

Documenting the forelimb responses evoked by stimulating sites in primate cervical spinal cord is significant for understanding spinal circuitry and for potential neuroprosthetic applications involving hand and arm. We examined the forelimb movements and electromyographic (EMG) muscle responses evoked by intraspinal microstimulation in three M. nemestrina monkeys sedated with ketamine. Trains of three stimulus pulses (10-80 muA) at 300 Hz were delivered at sites in regularly spaced tracks from C6 to T1. Hand and/or arm movements were evoked at 76% of the 745 sites stimulated. Specifically, movements were evoked in digits (76% of effective sites), wrist (15% of sites), elbow (26%), and shoulder (17%). To document the muscle activity evoked by a stimulus current just capable of eliciting consistent joint rotation, stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG were calculated at each site where a movement was observed. Typically, many muscles were coactivated at threshold currents needed to evoke movements. Out of the 13-15 muscles recorded per animal, only one muscle was active at 14% of the effective sites and two to six muscles were coactivated at 47% of sites. Thus intraspinal stimulation at threshold currents adequate for evoking movement typically coactivated multiple muscles, including antagonists. Histologic reconstruction of stimulation sites indicated that responses were elicited from the dorsal and ventral horn and from fiber tracts in the white matter, with little somatotopic organization for movement or muscle activation. The absence of a clear somatotopic map of output sites is probably a result of the stimulation of complex mixtures of fibers and cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971685     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00414.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  41 in total

1.  Upper-limb muscle responses to epidural, subdural and intraspinal stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Abigail N Sharpe; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Intraspinal microstimulation for respiratory muscle activation.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Comron N Ganji; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 3.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Novel Stroke Therapeutics: Unraveling Stroke Pathophysiology and Its Impact on Clinical Treatments.

Authors:  Paul M George; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Cervical intraspinal microstimulation evokes robust forelimb movements before and after injury.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Frances S Cho; Danielle R Lockwood; Amber S Fechko; Michael R Kasten; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Volitional walking via upper limb muscle-controlled stimulation of the lumbar locomotor center in man.

Authors:  Syusaku Sasada; Kenji Kato; Suguru Kadowaki; Stefan J Groiss; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Yukio Nishimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stability of output effects from motor cortex to forelimb muscles in primates.

Authors:  Darcy M Griffin; Heather M Hudson; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Convergence of pyramidal and medial brain stem descending pathways onto macaque cervical spinal interneurons.

Authors:  C Nicholas Riddle; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  M R Kasten; M D Sunshine; E S Secrist; P J Horner; C T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Spinal cord injury: present and future therapeutic devices and prostheses.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.