Literature DB >> 21828907

Reanimating the arm and hand with intraspinal microstimulation.

Jonas B Zimmermann1, Kazuhiko Seki, Andrew Jackson.   

Abstract

To date, there is no effective therapy for spinal cord injury, and many patients could benefit dramatically from at least partial restoration of arm and hand function. Despite a substantial body of research investigating intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) in frogs, rodents and cats, little is known about upper-limb responses to cervical stimulation in the primate. Here, we show for the first time that long trains of ISMS delivered to the macaque spinal cord can evoke functional arm and hand movements. Complex movements involving coordinated activation of multiple muscles could be elicited from a single electrode, while just two electrodes were required for independent control of reaching and grasping. We found that the motor responses to ISMS were described by a dual exponential model that depended only on stimulation history. We demonstrate that this model can be inverted to generate stimulus trains capable of eliciting arbitrary, graded motor responses, and could be used to restore volitional movements in a closed-loop brain-machine interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21828907      PMCID: PMC3306897          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/054001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  23 in total

1.  Responses to spinal microstimulation in the chronically spinalized rat and their relationship to spinal systems activated by low threshold cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  M C Tresch; E Bizzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Intraspinal microstimulation preferentially recruits fatigue-resistant muscle fibres and generates gradual force in rat.

Authors:  J A Bamford; C T Putman; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  The Neurochip BCI: towards a neural prosthesis for upper limb function.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson; Chet T Moritz; Jaideep Mavoori; Timothy H Lucas; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Intraspinal microstimulation excites multisegmental sensory afferents at lower stimulus levels than local alpha-motoneuron responses.

Authors:  R A Gaunt; A Prochazka; V K Mushahwar; L Guevremont; P H Ellaway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Forelimb movements and muscle responses evoked by microstimulation of cervical spinal cord in sedated monkeys.

Authors:  Chet T Moritz; Timothy H Lucas; Steve I Perlmutter; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Descending pathways in motor control.

Authors:  Roger N Lemon
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 7.  Action-based sensory encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits.

Authors:  Jens Schouenborg
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-09-05

8.  Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Vincent Bonin; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Direct control of paralysed muscles by cortical neurons.

Authors:  Chet T Moritz; Steve I Perlmutter; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Toward the restoration of hand use to a paralyzed monkey: brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation of forearm muscles.

Authors:  Eric A Pohlmeyer; Emily R Oby; Eric J Perreault; Sara A Solla; Kevin L Kilgore; Robert F Kirsch; Lee E Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

1.  Neuroscience: Brain-controlled robot grabs attention.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Upper-limb muscle responses to epidural, subdural and intraspinal stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Abigail N Sharpe; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Electrical neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord facilitates forelimb skilled function recovery in spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Benita Jin; Jonathan Keyes; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko; Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Cervical intraspinal microstimulation evokes robust forelimb movements before and after injury.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Frances S Cho; Danielle R Lockwood; Amber S Fechko; Michael R Kasten; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord--restoring motor function.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson; Jonas B Zimmermann
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Brain-controlled muscle stimulation for the restoration of motor function.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Evaluation of optimal electrode configurations for epidural spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Prithvi K Shah; Yury Gerasimenko; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  A 3D map of the hindlimb motor representation in the lumbar spinal cord in Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Jordan A Borrell; Shawn B Frost; Jeremy Peterson; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Microstimulation activates a handful of muscle synergies.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrea d'Avella; Jose M Carmena; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  M R Kasten; M D Sunshine; E S Secrist; P J Horner; C T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.