Literature DB >> 28192079

Electrical neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord facilitates forelimb skilled function recovery in spinal cord injured rats.

Monzurul Alam1, Guillermo Garcia-Alias1, Benita Jin1, Jonathan Keyes1, Hui Zhong1, Roland R Roy2, Yury Gerasimenko3, Daniel C Lu4, V Reggie Edgerton5.   

Abstract

Enabling motor control by epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord is a promising therapeutic technique for the recovery of motor function after a spinal cord injury (SCI). Although epidural electrical stimulation has resulted in improvement in hindlimb motor function, it is unknown whether it has any therapeutic benefit for improving forelimb fine motor function after a cervical SCI. We tested whether trains of pulses delivered at spinal cord segments C6 and C8 would facilitate the recovery of forelimb fine motor control after a cervical SCI in rats. Rats were trained to reach and grasp sugar pellets. Immediately after a dorsal funiculus crush at C4, the rats showed significant deficits in forelimb fine motor control. The rats were tested to reach and grasp with and without cervical epidural stimulation for 10weeks post-injury. To determine the best stimulation parameters to activate the cervical spinal networks involved in forelimb motor function, monopolar and bipolar currents were delivered at varying frequencies (20, 40, and 60Hz) concomitant with the reaching and grasping task. We found that cervical epidural stimulation increased reaching and grasping success rates compared to the no stimulation condition. Bipolar stimulation (C6- C8+ and C6+ C8-) produced the largest spinal motor-evoked potentials (sMEPs) and resulted in higher reaching and grasping success rates compared with monopolar stimulation (C6- Ref+ and C8- Ref+). Forelimb performance was similar when tested at stimulation frequencies of 20, 40, and 60Hz. We also found that the EMG activity in most forelimb muscles as well as the co-activation between flexor and extensor muscles increased post-injury. With epidural stimulation, however, this trend was reversed indicating that cervical epidural spinal cord stimulation has therapeutic potential for rehabilitation after a cervical SCI.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spinal cord injury; Corticospinal tract; Epidural electrical stimulation; Motor-evoked potentials; Reaching and grasping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28192079      PMCID: PMC6219872          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  42 in total

1.  Stepping-like movements in humans with complete spinal cord injury induced by epidural stimulation of the lumbar cord: electromyographic study of compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  K Minassian; B Jilge; F Rattay; M M Pinter; H Binder; F Gerstenbrand; M R Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Teager-Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Patrick Rider; Ken Steinweg; Paul DeVita; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Plasticity of subcortical pathways promote recovery of skilled hand function in rats after corticospinal and rubrospinal tract injuries.

Authors:  Guillermo García-Alías; Kevin Truong; Prithvi K Shah; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Cervical motoneuron topography reflects the proximodistal organization of muscles and movements of the rat forelimb: a retrograde carbocyanine dye analysis.

Authors:  J E McKenna; G T Prusky; I Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  M R Kasten; M D Sunshine; E S Secrist; P J Horner; C T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Coordination of motor pools controlling the ankle musculature in adult spinal cats during treadmill walking.

Authors:  C P de Guzman; R R Roy; J A Hodgson; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-08-02       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  [Locomotion induced by epidural stimulation in decerebrate cat after spinal cord injury].

Authors:  P E Musienko; N V Pavlova; V A Selionov; Iu P Gerasimenko
Journal:  Biofizika       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

8.  Complete and partial lesions of the pyramidal tract in the rat affect qualitative measures of skilled movements: impairment in fixations as a model for clumsy behavior.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Dionne M Piecharka; Felicia R Drever
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Therapeutic intraspinal stimulation to generate activity and promote long-term recovery.

Authors:  Sarah E Mondello; Michael R Kasten; Philip J Horner; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Spatiotemporal neuromodulation therapies engaging muscle synergies improve motor control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Nikolaus Wenger; Eduardo Martin Moraud; Jerome Gandar; Pavel Musienko; Marco Capogrosso; Laetitia Baud; Camille G Le Goff; Quentin Barraud; Natalia Pavlova; Nadia Dominici; Ivan R Minev; Leonie Asboth; Arthur Hirsch; Simone Duis; Julie Kreider; Andrea Mortera; Oliver Haverbeck; Silvio Kraus; Felix Schmitz; Jack DiGiovanna; Rubia van den Brand; Jocelyne Bloch; Peter Detemple; Stéphanie P Lacour; Erwan Bézard; Silvestro Micera; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Tissues of the Central Nervous System: Interfacing Conductive Biomaterials with Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Rebecca D Bierman-Duquette; Gevick Safarians; Joyce Huang; Bushra Rajput; Jessica Y Chen; Ze Zhong Wang; Stephanie K Seidlits
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Francisco D Benavides; Hang Jin Jo; Henrik Lundell; V Reggie Edgerton; Yuri Gerasimenko; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effect of VEGF on Inflammatory Regulation, Neural Survival, and Functional Improvement in Rats following a Complete Spinal Cord Transection.

Authors:  Jing Li; Shuangxi Chen; Zhikai Zhao; Yunhao Luo; Yuhui Hou; Heng Li; Liumin He; Libing Zhou; Wutian Wu
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 4.  Now is the Critical Time for Engineered Neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  A Proof-of-Concept Study of Transcutaneous Magnetic Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neurogenic Bladder.

Authors:  Tianyi Niu; Carol J Bennett; Tina L Keller; J C Leiter; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Stimulation and Repair of Peripheral Nerves Using Bioadhesive Graft-Antenna.

Authors:  Ashour Sliow; Zhi Ma; Gaetano Gargiulo; David Mahns; Damia Mawad; Paul Breen; Marcus Stoodley; Jessica Houang; Rhiannon Kuchel; Giuseppe C Tettamanzi; Richard D Tilley; Samuel J Frost; John Morley; Leonardo Longo; Antonio Lauto
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 16.806

7.  A wireless spinal stimulation system for ventral activation of the rat cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Matthew K Hogan; Sean M Barber; Zhoulyu Rao; Bethany R Kondiles; Meng Huang; William J Steele; Cunjiang Yu; Philip J Horner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Electrical epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord: implications for spinal respiratory neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ian G Malone; Rachel L Nosacka; Marissa A Nash; Kevin J Otto; Erica A Dale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Freyvert; Nicholas Au Yong; Erika Morikawa; Sharon Zdunowski; Melanie E Sarino; Yury Gerasimenko; V Reggie Edgerton; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Development of an Activity-Dependent Epidural Stimulation System in Freely Moving Spinal Cord Injured Rats: A Proof of Concept Study.

Authors:  Avi Rascoe; Pawan Sharma; Prithvi K Shah
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.