Literature DB >> 23543899

When does Iconicity in Sign Language Matter?

Cristina Baus1, Manuel Carreiras, Karen Emmorey.   

Abstract

We examined whether iconicity in American Sign Language (ASL) enhances translation performance for new learners and proficient signers. Fifteen hearing nonsigners and 15 proficient ASL-English bilinguals performed a translation recognition task and a production translation task. Nonsigners were taught 28 ASL verbs (14 iconic; 14 non-iconic) prior to performing these tasks. Only new learners benefited from sign iconicity, recognizing iconic translations faster and more accurately and exhibiting faster forward (English-ASL) and backward (ASL-English) translation times for iconic signs. In contrast, proficient ASL-English bilinguals exhibited slower recognition and translation times for iconic signs. We suggest iconicity aids memorization in the early stages of adult sign language learning, but for fluent L2 signers, iconicity interacts with other variables that slow translation (specifically, the iconic signs had more translation equivalents than the non-iconic signs). Iconicity may also have slowed translation performance by forcing conceptual mediation for iconic signs, which is slower than translating via direct lexical links.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Sign Language; bilingualism; iconicity; translation

Year:  2012        PMID: 23543899      PMCID: PMC3608132          DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.620374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  13 in total

1.  Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Thomas Grabowski; Stephen McCullough; Hanna Damasio; Laurie Ponto; Richard Hichwa; Ursula Bellugi
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The link between form and meaning in British sign language: effects of iconicity for phonological decisions.

Authors:  Robin L Thompson; David P Vinson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The role of iconicity in sign language learning by hearing adults.

Authors:  A K Lieberth; M E Gamble
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Aphasia in a user of British Sign Language: Dissociation between sign and gesture.

Authors:  Jane Marshall; Jo Atkinson; Elaine Smulovitch; Alice Thacker; Bencie Woll
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  "Tip of the fingers" experiences by deaf signers: insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon.

Authors:  Robin Thompson; Karen Emmorey; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-11

6.  The role of inconicity in early sign language acquisition.

Authors:  M D Orlansky; J D Bonvillian
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-08

7.  Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American sign language.

Authors:  H Poizner; U Bellugi; R D Tweney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The role of sign phonology and iconicity during sign processing: the case of deaf children.

Authors:  Ellen Ormel; Daan Hermans; Harry Knoors; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2009-07-20

9.  The link between form and meaning in American Sign Language: lexical processing effects.

Authors:  Robin L Thompson; David P Vinson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages.

Authors:  Pamela Perniss; Robin L Thompson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-31
View more
  13 in total

1.  Iconicity as structure mapping.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution.

Authors:  Gabriella Vigliocco; Pamela Perniss; David Vinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effects of iconicity and semantic relatedness on lexical access in american sign language.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Direction asymmetries in spoken and signed language interpreting.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2013-07

5.  Real-time processing of ASL signs: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the mental lexicon.

Authors:  Amy M Lieberman; Arielle Borovsky; Marla Hatrak; Rachel I Mayberry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The Road to Language Learning Is Not Entirely Iconic: Iconicity, Neighborhood Density, and Frequency Facilitate Acquisition of Sign Language.

Authors:  Naomi K Caselli; Jennie E Pyers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05-30

7.  L2M1 and L2M2 Acquisition of Sign Lexicon: The Impact of Multimodality on the Sign Second Language Acquisition.

Authors:  Krister Schönström; Ingela Holmström
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

8.  Mapping Word to World in ASL: Evidence from a Human Simulation Paradigm.

Authors:  Allison Fitch; Sudha Arunachalam; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-12

Review 9.  Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review.

Authors:  Gerardo Ortega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

10.  The cultural evolution of human communication systems in different sized populations: usability trumps learnability.

Authors:  Nicolas Fay; T Mark Ellison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.