Literature DB >> 15010234

Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming.

Karen Emmorey1, Thomas Grabowski, Stephen McCullough, Hanna Damasio, Laurie Ponto, Richard Hichwa, Ursula Bellugi.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography was used to investigate whether the motor-iconic basis of certain forms in American Sign Language (ASL) partially alters the neural systems engaged during lexical retrieval. Most ASL nouns denoting tools and ASL verbs referring to tool-based actions are produced with a handshape representing the human hand holding a tool and with an iconic movement depicting canonical tool use, whereas the visual iconicity of animal signs is more idiosyncratic and inconsistent across signs. We investigated whether the motor-iconic relation between a sign and its referent alters the neural substrate for lexical retrieval in ASL. Ten deaf native ASL signers viewed photographs of tools/utensils or of actions performed with or without an implement and were asked to overtly produce the ASL sign for each object or action. The control task required subjects to judge the orientation of unknown faces. Compared to the control task, naming tools engaged left inferior and middle frontal gyri, bilateral parietal lobe, and posterior inferotemporal cortex. Naming actions performed with or without a tool engaged left inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral parietal lobe, and posterior middle temporal gyrus at the temporo-occipital junction (area MT). When motor-iconic verbs were compared with non-iconic verbs, no differences in neural activation were found. Overall, the results indicate that even when the form of a sign is indistinguishable from a pantomimic gesture, the neural systems underlying its production mirror those engaged when hearing speakers name tools or tool-based actions with speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15010234     DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00309-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  18 in total

Review 1.  How we use rules to select actions: a review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Language and imagery: effects of language modality.

Authors:  Gabriella Vigliocco; David P Vinson; Tyron Woolfe; Matthew W G Dye; Bencie Woll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A neural system for learning about object function.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Miranda van Turennout; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Giving speech a hand: gesture modulates activity in auditory cortex during speech perception.

Authors:  Amy L Hubbard; Stephen M Wilson; Daniel E Callan; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Naomi K Caselli; Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Ariel M Cohen-Goldberg; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-04

6.  Effects of iconicity and semantic relatedness on lexical access in american sign language.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  When does Iconicity in Sign Language Matter?

Authors:  Cristina Baus; Manuel Carreiras; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-02-23

8.  The neural correlates of sign versus word production.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing.

Authors:  Julia Hocking; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Distinguishing the processing of gestures from signs in deaf individuals: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Fatima T Husain; Debra J Patkin; Hung Thai-Van; Allen R Braun; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.