Literature DB >> 19620251

The role of sign phonology and iconicity during sign processing: the case of deaf children.

Ellen Ormel1, Daan Hermans, Harry Knoors, Ludo Verhoeven.   

Abstract

To investigate the influence of sign phonology and iconicity during sign processing in deaf children, the roles of these sign features were examined using an experimental sign-picture verification paradigm. Participants had to make decisions about sign-picture pairs, manipulated according to phonological sign features (i.e., hand shape, movement, and location) and iconic sign features (i.e., transparent depiction of meaning or not). We found that phonologically related sign pairs resulted in relatively longer response latencies and more errors whereas iconic sign pairs resulted in relatively shorter response latencies and fewer errors. The results showed that competing lexical sign candidates (neighbor signs) were activated during sign processing by deaf children. In addition, deaf children exploit the iconicity of signs during sign recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19620251     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enp021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  10 in total

1.  Impacts of Visual Sonority and Handshape Markedness on Second Language Learning of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Joshua T Williams; Sharlene D Newman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-06

2.  Parafoveal activation of sign translation previews among deaf readers during the reading of Chinese sentences.

Authors:  Jinger Pan; Hua Shu; Yuling Wang; Ming Yan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

3.  When does Iconicity in Sign Language Matter?

Authors:  Cristina Baus; Manuel Carreiras; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-02-23

4.  Lexical Recognition in Deaf Children Learning American Sign Language: Activation of Semantic and Phonological Features of Signs.

Authors:  Amy M Lieberman; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2020-06-03

5.  Prediction in a visual language: real-time sentence processing in American Sign Language across development.

Authors:  Amy M Lieberman; Arielle Borovsky; Rachel I Mayberry
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Real-time processing of ASL signs: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the mental lexicon.

Authors:  Amy M Lieberman; Arielle Borovsky; Marla Hatrak; Rachel I Mayberry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages.

Authors:  Pamela Perniss; Robin L Thompson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-31

8.  Phonological reduplication in sign language: Rules rule.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Amanda Dupuis; Diane Brentari
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-10

9.  Ongoing Sign Processing Facilitates Written Word Recognition in Deaf Native Signing Children.

Authors:  Barbara Hänel-Faulhaber; Margriet Anna Groen; Brigitte Röder; Claudia K Friedrich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-05

10.  From iconic handshapes to grammatical contrasts: longitudinal evidence from a child homesigner.

Authors:  Marie Coppola; Diane Brentari
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.