Literature DB >> 23543423

Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: is there a cross-language difference?

Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez1, Kathleen Rastle.   

Abstract

Research on the impact of letter transpositions that arise across morpheme boundaries has yielded conflicting results. These results have led to the suggestion that a cross-linguistic difference may exist in the recognition of Spanish and English words. In two masked-priming experiments run on separate groups of Spanish and English speakers, we tested this hypothesis by comparing the impacts of primes with letter transpositions that arose within morphemes or across morpheme boundaries on the recognition of identical or near-identical Spanish-English cognate targets. The results showed transposed-letter benefits in both Spanish and English that were not modulated by the position of the transposed letter in the prime stimulus. Our findings therefore add to the growing body of literature suggesting that the transposed-letter benefit is not affected by the position of the transposed letters relative to the morpheme boundary, and they dispel previous suggestions that there might be a genuine difference in orthographic coding across the Spanish and English writing systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23543423     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

2.  Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Elisabeth Beyersmann; Max Coltheart; Anne Castles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The broth in my brother's brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Kathleen Rastle; Matthew H Davis; Boris New
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

5.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes.

Authors:  Kiel Christianson; Rebecca L Johnson; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-01-10

7.  Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries.

Authors:  Elisabeth Beyersmann; Samantha F McCormick; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  On the Interaction of Letter Transpositions and Morphemic Boundaries.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl; Anurag Rimzhim
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-12

9.  Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  6 in total

1.  Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries.

Authors:  Ehsan Shafiee Zargar; Naoko Witzel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

2.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

4.  Insights from letter position dyslexia on morphological decomposition in reading.

Authors:  Naama Friedmann; Aviah Gvion; Roni Nisim
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming.

Authors:  Joyse Medeiros; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14

6.  Neural correlates of confusability in recognition of morphologically complex Korean words.

Authors:  Jeahong Kim; JeYoung Jung; Kichun Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.