Literature DB >> 18729592

The overlap model: a model of letter position coding.

Pablo Gomez1, Roger Ratcliff, Manuel Perea.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that letter identity and letter position are not integral perceptual dimensions (e.g., jugde primes judge in word-recognition experiments). Most comprehensive computational models of visual word recognition (e.g., the interactive activation model, J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart, 1981, and its successors) assume that the position of each letter within a word is perfectly encoded. Thus, these models are unable to explain the presence of effects of letter transposition (trial-trail), letter migration (beard-bread), repeated letters (moose-mouse), or subset/superset effects (faulty-faculty). The authors extend R. Ratcliff's (1981) theory of order relations for encoding of letter positions and show that the model can successfully deal with these effects. The basic assumption is that letters in the visual stimulus have distributions over positions so that the representation of one letter will extend into adjacent letter positions. To test the model, the authors conducted a series of forced-choice perceptual identification experiments. The overlap model produced very good fits to the empirical data, and even a simplified 2-parameter model was capable of producing fits for 104 observed data points with a correlation coefficient of .91. Copyright (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18729592      PMCID: PMC2597794          DOI: 10.1037/a0012667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  58 in total

1.  A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon; M Verwoerd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding.

Authors:  Carol Whitney
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.

Authors:  F G Ashby; W Prinzmetal; R Ivry; W T Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A theory of perceptual matching.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A probabilistic multidimensional model of location information.

Authors:  W T Maddox; W Prinzmetal; R B Ivry; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

9.  The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.

Authors:  Joana Acha; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2007-07-12

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  84 in total

1.  Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Albert Gatt; Carmen Moret-Tatay; Ray Fabri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  On the time-course of adjacent and non-adjacent transposed-letter priming.

Authors:  Maria Ktori; Brechtsje Kingma; Thomas Hannagan; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-08-01

3.  An ERP investigation of orthographic precision in deaf and hearing readers.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

5.  Orthographic similarity: the case of "reversed anagrams".

Authors:  Alison L Morris; Mary L Still
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

6.  Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

7.  Representation of letter position in spelling: evidence from acquired dysgraphia.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Michael McCloskey; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-04-08

8.  The search for an input-coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Reem Abu Mallouh; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

9.  Does LGHT prime DARK? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

10.  ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.