Literature DB >> 24643819

Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries.

Jon Andoni Duñabeitia1, Manuel Perea, Manuel Carreiras.   

Abstract

Early morphological decomposition of complex words has been supported by evidence showing that the magnitude of masked transposed-letter (TL) priming effects is greater for within-morpheme transpositions than for between-morpheme transpositions. However, these findings have lately been called into question, and a recent article by Sánchez-Gutiérrez and Rastle (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 988-996, 2013) suggested that the above-mentioned interaction could have been the consequence of a false positive (i.e., a Type I error). Considering recent evidence showing that morpho-orthographic interactions are highly sensitive to individual differences in reading skills, we explored whether participants' averaged reading speeds were responsible for modulating the size of within- versus between-morpheme TL priming effects. A large-scale lexical decision experiment with a set of 420 suffixed Spanish words (N = 80 participants) was run using the masked-priming technique. The results revealed that individual differences modulated the magnitude of the masked TL priming effect between morphemes: Faster readers (but not slower readers) yielded greater TL priming for within- than for between-morpheme transpositions. The present data help reconcile previous divergent data by showing that faster readers revealed a morpho-orthographic interaction, whereas slower readers may rely more on a morphological-processing strategy that is not sensitive to morpho-orthographic interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24643819     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  35 in total

1.  The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Sara J Unsworth; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-01

2.  When orthographic neighbors fail to facilitate.

Authors:  Tracy Janack; Matthew J Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

4.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Carol Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The broth in my brother's brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Kathleen Rastle; Matthew H Davis; Boris New
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

6.  BuscaPalabras: a program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-11

7.  Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.

Authors:  Clive Frankish; Lisa Barnes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm.

Authors:  Tuomo Häikiö; Raymond Bertram; Jukka Hyönä; Pekka Niemi
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-06-05

Review 9.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification.

Authors:  Simona Amenta; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries.

Authors:  Ehsan Shafiee Zargar; Naoko Witzel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

2.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.

Authors:  Laurie B Feldman; Petar Milin; Kit W Cho; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín; Patrick A O'Connor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming.

Authors:  Joyse Medeiros; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14

5.  Neural correlates of confusability in recognition of morphologically complex Korean words.

Authors:  Jeahong Kim; JeYoung Jung; Kichun Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.