Literature DB >> 22540902

Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition.

Elisabeth Beyersmann1, Max Coltheart, Anne Castles.   

Abstract

Models of morphological processing make different predictions about whether morphologically complex written words are initially decomposed and recognized on the basis of their morphemic subunits or whether they can directly be accessed as whole words and at what point semantics begin to influence morphological processing. In this study, we used unprimed and masked primed lexical decision to compare truly suffixed (darkest) and pseudosuffixed words (glossary) with within-boundary (drakest/golssary) to across-boundary (darekst/glosasry) letter transpositions. Significant transposed-letter similarity effects were found independently of the morphological position of the letter transposition, demonstrating that, in English, morphologically complex whole-word representations can be directly accessed at initial word processing stages. In a third masked primed lexical decision experiment, the same materials were used in the context of stem target priming, and it was found that truly suffixed primes facilitate the recognition of their stem-target (darkest-DARK) to the same extent as pseudosuffixed primes (glossary-GLOSS), which is consistent with theories of early morpho-orthographic decomposition. Taken together, our findings provide evidence for both whole-word access and morphological decomposition at initial stages of visual word recognition and are discussed in the context of a hybrid account.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22540902     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.672437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  9 in total

1.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: is there a cross-language difference?

Authors:  Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

2.  A neuronal gamma oscillatory signature during morphological unification in the left occipitotemporal junction.

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Peter Hagoort; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

5.  Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming.

Authors:  Joyse Medeiros; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14

6.  Character Decomposition and Transposition Processes of Chinese Compound Words in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.

Authors:  Hong-Wen Cao; Ke-Yu Yang; Hong-Mei Yan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Embedded stems as a bootstrapping mechanism for morphological parsing during reading development.

Authors:  Elisabeth Beyersmann; Jonathan Grainger; Anne Castles
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-02-15

8.  Neural correlates of confusability in recognition of morphologically complex Korean words.

Authors:  Jeahong Kim; JeYoung Jung; Kichun Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Training of Morphological Decomposition in Word Processing and Its Effects on Literacy Skills.

Authors:  Irit Bar-Kochva; Marcus Hasselhorn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.