Literature DB >> 20161017

Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew.

Hadas Velan1, Ram Frost.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of letter transposition in Hebrew in three masked-priming experiments. Hebrew, like English has an alphabetic orthography where sequential and contiguous letter strings represent phonemes. However, being a Semitic language it has a non-concatenated morphology that is based on root derivations. Experiment 1 showed that transposed-letter (TL) root primes inhibited responses to targets derived from the non-transposed root letters, and that this inhibition was unrelated to relative root frequency. Experiment 2 replicated this result and showed that if the transposed letters of the root created a nonsense-root that had no lexical representation, then no inhibition and no facilitation were obtained. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that in contrast to English, French, or Spanish, TL nonword primes did not facilitate recognition of targets, and when the root letters embedded in them consisted of a legal root morpheme, they produced inhibition. These results suggest that lexical space in alphabetic orthographies may be structured very differently in different languages if their morphological structure diverges qualitatively. In Hebrew, lexical space is organized according to root families rather than simple orthographic structure, so that all words derived from the same root are interconnected or clustered together, independent of overall orthographic similarity.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161017      PMCID: PMC2748959          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  36 in total

1.  Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology.

Authors:  R Frost; A Deutsch; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

3.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

6.  Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Tamar Kugler; Avital Deutsch; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

8.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.

Authors:  E Drews; P Zwitserlood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  A Deutsch; R Frost; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  20 in total

1.  The search for an input-coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Reem Abu Mallouh; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

2.  Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: are they orthographic in nature?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Chie Nakatani; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

3.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: is there a cross-language difference?

Authors:  Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

4.  The Separability of Morphological Processes from Semantic Meaning and Syntactic Class in Production of Single Words: Evidence from the Hebrew Root Morpheme.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

5.  Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries.

Authors:  Ehsan Shafiee Zargar; Naoko Witzel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

6.  On the Interaction of Letter Transpositions and Morphemic Boundaries.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl; Anurag Rimzhim
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-12

7.  What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Itamar Lerner; Blair C Armstrong; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-15

9.  Towards a universal model of reading.

Authors:  Ram Frost
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Avital Deutsch; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.