Literature DB >> 23532537

Validation of the species sensitivity distribution in retrospective risk assessment of herbicides at the river basin scale-the Scheldt river basin case study.

Sona Jesenska1, Sabina Nemethova, Ludek Blaha.   

Abstract

Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) is commonly used in prospective risk assessment to derive predicted no-effect concentrations, toxicity exposure ratios, and environmental quality standards for individual chemicals such as pesticides. The application of SSD in the retrospective risk assessment of chemical mixtures at the river basin scale (i.e., the estimation of "multiple substance potentially affected fractions" [msPAFs]) has been suggested, but detailed critical assessment of such an application is missing. The present study investigated the impact of different data validation approaches in a retrospective model case study focused on seven herbicides monitored at the Scheldt river basin (Belgium) between 1998 and 2009. The study demonstrated the successful application of the SSD approach. Relatively high impacts of herbicides on aquatic primary producers were predicted. Often, up to 40 % of the primary producer communities were affected, as predicted by chronic msPAF, and in some cases, the predicted impacts were even more pronounced. The risks posed by the studied herbicides decreased during the 1998-2009 period, along with decreasing concentrations of highly toxic pesticides such as simazine or isoproturon. Various data validation approaches (the removal of duplicate values and outliers, the testing of different exposure durations and purities of studied herbicides, etc.) substantially affected SSD at the level of individual studied compounds. However, the time-consuming validation procedures had only a minor impact on the outcomes of the retrospective risk assessment of herbicide mixtures at the river basin scale. Selection of the appropriate taxonomic group for SSD calculation and selection of the species-specific endpoint (i.e., the most sensitive or average value per species) were the most critical steps affecting the final risk values predicted. The present validation study provides a methodological basis for the practical use of SSD in the retrospective risk assessment of chemical mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23532537     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1644-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  26 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

Authors:  J R Wheeler; E P M Grist; K M Y Leung; D Morritt; M Crane
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Comparing aquatic risk assessment methods for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides metribuzin and metamitron.

Authors:  Theo C M Brock; Steven J H Crum; John W Deneer; Fred Heimbach; Rudi M M Roijackers; Jos A Sinkeldam
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Naomi Blake; Theo C M Brock; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Aquatic risk assessment of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida.

Authors:  Lance J Schuler; Gary M Rand
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  The evolution of the Environmental Quality concept: from the US EPA Red Book to the European Water Framework Directive.

Authors:  Marco Vighi; Antonio Finizio; Sara Villa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria.

Authors:  N M van Straalen; C A Denneman
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Patterning ecological risk of pesticide contamination at the river basin scale.

Authors:  Leslie Faggiano; Dick de Zwart; Emili García-Berthou; Sovan Lek; Muriel Gevrey
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Deborah N Vivian; Charles Delos; Mace G Barron
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  EU Water Framework Directive and Stockholm Convention: can we reach the targets for priority substances and persistent organic pollutants?

Authors:  Maria Fuerhacker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.223

View more
  2 in total

1.  Same sensitivity with shorter exposure: behavior as an appropriate parameter to assess metal toxicity.

Authors:  Álvaro Alonso; Alberto Romero-Blanco
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in the River Madre de Dios, Costa Rica using PERPEST, SSD, and msPAF models.

Authors:  Robert A Rämö; Paul J van den Brink; Clemens Ruepert; Luisa E Castillo; Jonas S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.