Literature DB >> 10805987

Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

T Aldenberg1, J S Jaworska.   

Abstract

Species in the environment vary according to their sensitivity to a toxicant. Because these differences in sensitivity are unique to the toxicant at consideration and laboratory data sets to assess this variability are very small due to cost, it is important to provide uncertainty estimates of (1) environmental quality objectives (hazardous concentrations) derived from these laboratory data and (2) fraction of species affected at given, or predicted, laboratory or environmental concentrations. This article focuses on the normal (Gaussian) distribution of species sensitivity. It examines and compares results of Problems (1) and (2) from two opposing statistical philosophies, Bayesian and Classical, leading to vastly different numerical approaches. For the normal model, both approaches lead to identical answers, numerically. Extrapolation factors for the lower, median, and upper estimates of the hazardous concentration at six levels of protection are derived. Furthermore, upper, median, and lower estimates of the fraction affected at given, standardized, logarithmic concentrations have been tabulated. This table can be used directly for risk assessment without reference to protection levels or hazardous concentrations. The confidence limits for hazardous concentration and fraction affected depend heavily on the number of species tested and are independent of the toxic substance involved (provided the model is right), due to correction for the mean and standard deviation of the toxicity data. The equivalence of confidence limits for hazardous concentration and fraction affected is captured in the law of extrapolation: the upper (median, lower) confidence limit for the fraction affected at the lower (median, upper) confidence limit of the hazardous concentration is equal to the fraction affected (e.g., 5%) used to define the hazardous concentration. The upper confidence limit for the fraction affected at the median estimate of the hazardous concentration for 5% of the species is a fixed number depending on the sample size of the toxicity data only. It amounts to 46% at n=3, down to 20% at n=10, and still 12% at n 30. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10805987     DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1999.1869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  33 in total

1.  Impact of triphenyltin acetate in microcosms simulating floodplain lakes. II. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions between laboratory and semi-field.

Authors:  I Roessink; J D M Belgers; S J H Crum; P J van den Brink; T C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Evaluation of suitable endpoints for assessing the impacts of toxicants at the community level.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Kouchi Goka
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Derivation of soil values for the path 'soil-soil organisms' for metals and selected organic compounds using species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  Stephan Jänsch; Jörg Römbke; Hans-Joachim Schallnass; Konstantin Terytze
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions for species from China and the USA.

Authors:  Xiaonan Wang; Zhenguang Yan; Zhengtao Liu; Cong Zhang; Weili Wang; Handong Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Assessment of uncertainty in chemical models by Bayesian probabilities: Why, when, how?

Authors:  Ullrika Sahlin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Derivation of water quality criteria of phenanthrene using interspecies correlation estimation models for aquatic life in China.

Authors:  Jiangyue Wu; Zhengtao Liu; Zhenguang Yan; Xianliang Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 68 pesticides used in Japanese paddy fields.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 1.519

Review 8.  Ecotoxicity of boric acid in standard laboratory tests with plants and soil organisms.

Authors:  Juliska Princz; Leonie Becker; Adam Scheffczyk; Gladys Stephenson; Rick Scroggins; Thomas Moser; Jörg Römbke
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Validation of the species sensitivity distribution in retrospective risk assessment of herbicides at the river basin scale-the Scheldt river basin case study.

Authors:  Sona Jesenska; Sabina Nemethova; Ludek Blaha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Effects of the pyrethroid insecticide gamma-cyhalothrin on aquatic invertebrates in laboratory and outdoor microcosm tests.

Authors:  René P A van Wijngaarden; Ian Barber; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.