Literature DB >> 2693071

Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria.

N M van Straalen1, C A Denneman.   

Abstract

To implement the Soil Protection Act of 1986, the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning, and Environment has recently proposed a list of soil quality reference values. These values are, as yet, insufficiently based on ecotoxicological evidence. In this paper, a three-step procedure of risk assessment for soil contaminants is proposed. Arguing from experimental results concerning no observed effect concentrations for a set of selected soil organisms, the method aims at protecting a certain fraction of soil life, taking factors such as soil organic matter and clay content into account. When applied to cadmium, a concentration protecting 95% of soil invertebrates is estimated as 0.16 micrograms/g for a standard soil. The value of 0.8 micrograms/g, as proposed by the Dutch authorities, may, given the present variation and uncertainty of toxicity data, protect about 85% of the soil invertebrate fauna. It is concluded that even low levels of cadmium in soil may endanger the functioning of some sensitive soil animal species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2693071     DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(89)90018-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  29 in total

1.  Estimating the 5-percentile of the species sensitivity distributions without any assumptions about the distribution.

Authors:  N van der Hoeven
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Impact of triphenyltin acetate in microcosms simulating floodplain lakes. II. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions between laboratory and semi-field.

Authors:  I Roessink; J D M Belgers; S J H Crum; P J van den Brink; T C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Effects of a mixture of two insecticides in freshwater microcosms: II. Responses of plankton and ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Elizabeth M Hartgers; Ronald Gylstra; Fred Bransen; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Cd and Zn concentration in hybrid poplar foliage and leaf beetles grown on polluted sediment-derived soils.

Authors:  Bart Vandecasteele; Raf Lauriks; Bruno De Vos; Filip M G Tack
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Optimized design for earthworm survival tests in soil.

Authors:  S C Sheppard; W G Evenden
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions for species from China and the USA.

Authors:  Xiaonan Wang; Zhenguang Yan; Zhengtao Liu; Cong Zhang; Weili Wang; Handong Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Extrapolation methods for setting ecological standards for water quality: statistical and ecological concerns.

Authors:  E P Smith; J Cairns
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Marine environmental risk assessment and acute water quality criterion for pentachlorophenol in coastal waters.

Authors:  R Beiras; T Tato
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Toxicity of pentachlorophenol to native aquatic species in the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Xiaowei Jin; Jinmiao Zha; Yiping Xu; John P Giesy; Zijian Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Terrestrial isopods: useful biological indicators of urban metal pollution.

Authors:  Reinhard Dallinger; Burkhard Berger; Stefan Birkel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.