Literature DB >> 12398385

Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

J R Wheeler1, E P M Grist, K M Y Leung, D Morritt, M Crane.   

Abstract

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) are increasingly incorporated into ecological risk assessment procedures. Although these new techniques offer a more transparent approach to risk assessment they demand more and superior quality data. Issues of data quantity and quality are especially important for marine datasets that tend to be smaller (and have fewer standard test methods) when compared with freshwater data. An additional source of uncertainty when using SSDs is appropriate selection from the range of methods used in their construction. We show through examples the influence of data quantity, data quality, and choice of model. We then show how regulatory decisions may be affected by these factors.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12398385     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00327-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  51 in total

1.  Deriving field-based sediment quality guidelines from the relationship between species density and contaminant level using a novel nonparametric empirical Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Gilbert C S Lui; W K Li; Anders Bjørgesæter; Kenneth M Y Leung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions for species from China and the USA.

Authors:  Xiaonan Wang; Zhenguang Yan; Zhengtao Liu; Cong Zhang; Weili Wang; Handong Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  A plea for the use of copepods in freshwater ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Devdutt Kulkarni; André Gergs; Udo Hommen; Hans Toni Ratte; Thomas G Preuss
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC(5) of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Gang Yu; Jun Huang; Hongying Hu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Toxicity of pentachlorophenol to native aquatic species in the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Xiaowei Jin; Jinmiao Zha; Yiping Xu; John P Giesy; Zijian Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  On the occurrence of a widespread contamination by herbicides of coral reef biota in French Polynesia.

Authors:  Bernard Salvat; Hélène Roche; François Ramade
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Sensitivity of animals to chemical compounds links to metabolic rate.

Authors:  Jan Baas; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Derivation of water quality criteria of phenanthrene using interspecies correlation estimation models for aquatic life in China.

Authors:  Jiangyue Wu; Zhengtao Liu; Zhenguang Yan; Xianliang Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Prediction models for transfer of arsenic from soil to corn grain (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Hua Yang; Zhaojun Li; Jian Long; Yongchao Liang; Jianming Xue; Murray Davis; Wenxiang He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Soil ecological criteria for nickel as a function of soil properties.

Authors:  XiaoQing Wang; DongPu Wei; YiBing Ma; Mike J McLaughlin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.