Literature DB >> 15719998

Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.

Lorraine Maltby1, Naomi Blake, Theo C M Brock, Paul J van den Brink.   

Abstract

Single-species acute toxicity data and (micro)mesocosm data were collated for 16 insecticides. These data were used to investigate the importance of test-species selection in constructing species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) and the ability of estimated hazardous concentrations (HCs) to protect freshwater aquatic ecosystems. A log-normal model was fitted to a minimum of six data points, and the resulting distribution was used to estimate lower (95% confidence), median (50% confidence), and upper (5% confidence) 5% HC (HC5) values. Species sensitivity distributions for specific taxonomic groups (vertebrates, arthropods, nonarthropod invertebrates), habitats (saltwater, freshwater, lentic, lotic), and geographical regions (Palaearctic, Nearctic, temperate, tropical) were compared. The taxonomic composition of the species assemblage used to construct the SSD does have a significant influence on the assessment of hazard, but the habitat and geographical distribution of the species do not. Moreover, SSDs constructed using species recommended in test guidelines did not differ significantly from those constructed using nonrecommended species. Hazardous concentrations estimated using laboratory-derived acute toxicity data for freshwater arthropods (i.e., the most sensitive taxonomic group) were compared to the response of freshwater ecosystems exposed to insecticides. The sensitivity distributions of freshwater arthropods were similar for both field and laboratory exposure, and the lower HC5 (95% protection with 95% confidence) estimate was protective of adverse ecological effects in freshwater ecosystems. The corresponding median HC5 (95% protection level with 50% confidence) was generally protective of single applications of insecticide but not of continuous or multiple applications. In the latter cases, a safety factor of at least five should be applied to the median HC5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15719998     DOI: 10.1897/04-025r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  53 in total

1.  Impact of triphenyltin acetate in microcosms simulating floodplain lakes. II. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions between laboratory and semi-field.

Authors:  I Roessink; J D M Belgers; S J H Crum; P J van den Brink; T C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Evaluation of suitable endpoints for assessing the impacts of toxicants at the community level.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Kouchi Goka
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  SSD-based rating system for the classification of pesticide risk on biodiversity.

Authors:  Serenella Sala; Sonia Migliorati; Gianna S Monti; Marco Vighi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Is it possible to extrapolate results of aquatic microcosm and mesocosm experiments with pesticides between climate zones in Europe?

Authors:  Michiel A Daam; Maria José Cerejeira; Paul J Van den Brink; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Comparison of specific versus literature species sensitivity distributions for herbicides risk assessment.

Authors:  Floriane Larras; Vincent Gregorio; Agnès Bouchez; Bernard Montuelle; Nathalie Chèvre
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Small is useful in endocrine disrupter assessment--four key recommendations for aquatic invertebrate research.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Effects of chlorpyrifos on macroinvertebrate communities in coastal stream mesocosms.

Authors:  Anne Colville; Peter Jones; Fleur Pablo; Frederick Krassoi; Grant Hose; Richard Lim
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Derivation of soil values for the path 'soil-soil organisms' for metals and selected organic compounds using species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  Stephan Jänsch; Jörg Römbke; Hans-Joachim Schallnass; Konstantin Terytze
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions for species from China and the USA.

Authors:  Xiaonan Wang; Zhenguang Yan; Zhengtao Liu; Cong Zhang; Weili Wang; Handong Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Effects of the pyrethroid insecticide gamma-cyhalothrin on aquatic invertebrates in laboratory and outdoor microcosm tests.

Authors:  René P A van Wijngaarden; Ian Barber; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.