Literature DB >> 23529634

Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems.

Matthew P Abdel1, David G Lewallen, Daniel J Berry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures is challenging, and high failure and complication rates have been reported in many series. The optimal techniques and implants for the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures remain in debate. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a relatively new class of femoral implants, uncemented fluted, tapered, modular stems, to treat periprosthetic femur fractures; we specifically evaluated (1) fracture union; (2) implant stability; (3) patient outcomes; and (4) complications.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 44 Vancouver B2 (25 patients) and B3 (19 patients) periprosthetic femur fractures treated consecutively with fluted, tapered stems at a single institution from 2000 to 2006. The mean patient age was 72 years (range, 34-92 years), and 24 were women. The minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 4.5 years; range, 2-8 years).
RESULTS: Forty-three of 44 (98%) fractures healed radiographically and 43 of 44 (98%) femoral components were stable radiographically at latest followup. The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 83. There were seven additional reoperations (five for recurrent instability, two for deep infections).
CONCLUSIONS: Modular fluted, tapered stems provide a reliable treatment method for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures with a high rate of fracture union and implant osteointegration. The most common complication, instability, may be reduced by more consistent use of larger femoral head diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23529634      PMCID: PMC3890202          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2936-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

Review 1.  A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR.

Authors:  D C Wirtz; K D Heller; U Holzwarth; C Siebert; R P Pitto; G Zeiler; B A Blencke; R Forst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Mats O Beckman; Anders Enocson; Anders Schmalholz; André Stark
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem.

Authors:  Sanjay Mulay; Tarig Hassan; Stuart Birtwistle; Richard Power
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

5.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Louis M Kwong; A John Miller; Phillipp Lubinus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures.

Authors:  R K Beals; S S Tower
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Stefanie Werber; Ulrich Holzwarth; Günther Zeiler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem.

Authors:  Jose A Rodriguez; Robert Fada; Steven B Murphy; Vijay J Rasquinha; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  7 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  CORR Insights(®): High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Distal fixation stems for revision of total hip replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Lopreite; Leonel Perez Alamino; Harold Simesen de Bielke; German Garabano; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-21

5.  Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.

Authors:  Gihan Jayasinghe; Chris Buckle; Lucy Clare Maling; Christopher To; Chukwudubem Anibueze; Parthiban Vinayakam; Richard Slack
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-05

6.  Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Yu Zhang; Yu-Hang Bao; Zhi Yang; Guo-Chun Zha; Xiang-Yang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Factors influencing results and complications in proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study at 1- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-07-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.