Literature DB >> 19364232

Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering.

Glenn S Brown1, K Geoffrey White.   

Abstract

Traditional theories of delayed matching-to-sample performance do not predict that accuracy will improve when absolute levels of reinforcement are increased. This prediction emerges only when reinforcement context is considered (J. A. Nevin, M. Davison, A. L. Odum, & T. A. Shahan, 2007). To provide quantitative data, the authors factorially manipulated between conditions the probability and duration of reinforcement for correct choices by pigeons. In Experiment 1, increasing the value of either variable improved initial discriminability of the forgetting functions, but did not affect the rate of forgetting. In Experiment 2, initial discriminability covaried with changes in choice immediacy and trial completion rate, suggesting a relationship with response strength consistent with Nevin et al.'s behavioral momentum model. Adding reinforcement context to K. G. White and J. T. Wixted's (1999) model also generates predictions consistent with the present experiments and with the effects of manipulating extraneous reinforcement. The inclusion of reinforcement context thus improves predictions of delayed matching-to-sample performance. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19364232     DOI: 10.1037/a0013864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  9 in total

1.  What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models?

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Derek D Reed
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2009

2.  Psychophysics of remembering: to bias or not to bias.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reversing the course of forgetting.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Delayed matching to sample: reinforcement has opposite effects on resistance to change in two related procedures.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum; Ryan Ward
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Remifentanil maintains lower initial delayed nonmatching-to-sample accuracy compared to food pellets in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Sarah E Hall; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Optimisation of cognitive performance in rodent operant (touchscreen) testing: Evaluation and effects of reinforcer strength.

Authors:  Benjamin U Phillips; Christopher J Heath; Zofia Ossowska; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.