Literature DB >> 22478391

Negative effects of positive reinforcement.

Michael Perone1.   

Abstract

Procedures classified as positive reinforcement are generally regarded as more desirable than those classified as aversive-those that involve negative reinforcement or punishment. This is a crude test of the desirability of a procedure to change or maintain behavior. The problems can be identified on the basis of theory, experimental analysis, and consideration of practical cases. Theoretically, the distinction between positive and negative reinforcement has proven difficult (some would say the distinction is untenable). When the distinction is made purely in operational terms, experiments reveal that positive reinforcement has aversive functions. On a practical level, positive reinforcement can lead to deleterious effects, and it is implicated in a range of personal and societal problems. These issues challenge us to identify other criteria for judging behavioral procedures.

Year:  2003        PMID: 22478391      PMCID: PMC2731445          DOI: 10.1007/bf03392064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal        ISSN: 0738-6729


  7 in total

1.  Time-out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Shock intensity and signaled avoidance responding.

Authors:  D Das Graças De Souza; A B Alves De Moraes; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Selective punishment of interresponse times: The roles of shock intensity and scheduling.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; F R Maxwell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Aversive control: A separate domain?

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude.

Authors:  M Perone; K Courtney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Chained concurrent schedules: reinforcement as situation transition.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Variable-interval schedules of timeout from avoidance.

Authors:  M Perone; M Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  18 in total

1.  The distinction between positive and negative reinforcement: use with care.

Authors:  Alan Baron; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

2.  Distinguishing between positive and negative reinforcement: responses to and.

Authors:  Alan Baron; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

3.  The ultimate challenge: prove B. F. Skinner wrong.

Authors:  Paul Chance
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2007

4.  Positive and negative reinforcement: Should the distinction be preserved?

Authors:  Alan Baron; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2005

5.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

6.  The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at zero, fifty, and one hundred.

Authors:  A Charles Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Development and modification of a response class via positive and negative reinforcement: a translational approach.

Authors:  Amber E Mendres; John C Borrero
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

8.  Advance Notice for Transition-Related Problem Behavior: Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Adam T Brewer; Kathleen Strickland-Cohen; Wesley Dotson; D Courtney Williams
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2014-08-19

9.  Successful implementation of cooperative handling eliminates the need for restraint in a complex non-human primate disease model.

Authors:  Melanie L Graham; Eric F Rieke; Lucas A Mutch; Elizabeth K Zolondek; Aaron W Faig; Theresa A Dufour; James W Munson; Jessica A Kittredge; Henk-Jan Schuurman
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 0.667

10.  Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Sarah E Hall; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.