Literature DB >> 23522969

Prevalence and 5- to 6-year incidence and progression of myopia and hyperopia in Australian schoolchildren.

Amanda N French1, Ian G Morgan, George Burlutsky, Paul Mitchell, Kathryn A Rose.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence, incidence, and change in refractive errors for Australian schoolchildren and examine the impact of ethnicity and sex.
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study, a 5- to 6-year follow-up of the Sydney Myopia Study, examined 2760 children in 2 age cohorts, 12 and 17 years. Longitudinal data were available for 870 and 1202 children in the younger and older cohorts, respectively.
METHODS: Children completed a comprehensive examination, including cycloplegic autorefraction (cyclopentolate 1%; Canon RK-F1). Myopia was defined as ≤-0.50 diopters (D) and hyperopia as ≥+2.00 D right eye spherical equivalent refraction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and follow-up refraction.
RESULTS: Prevalence of myopia increased between baseline and follow-up for both the younger (1.4%-14.4%; P<0.0001) and older cohorts (13.0%-29.6%; P<0.0001). The annual incidence of myopia was 2.2% in the younger cohort and 4.1% in the older. Children of East Asian ethnicity had a higher annual incidence of myopia (younger 6.9%, older 7.3%) than European Caucasian children (younger 1.3%, older 2.9%; all P<0.0001). The prevalence of myopia in European Caucasian children almost doubled between the older (4.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-5.8) and younger samples (8.6%; 95% CI, 6.7-10.6) when both were aged 12 years. Children with ametropia at baseline were more likely to have a significant shift in refraction (hyperopia: odds ratio [OR], 3.4 [95% CI, 1.2-9.8]; myopia: OR, 6.3 [95% CI, 3.7-10.8]) compared with children with no refractive error. There was no significant difference in myopia progression between children of European Caucasian and East Asian ethnicity (P = 0.7).
CONCLUSIONS: In Sydney, myopia prevalence (14.4%, 29.6%) and incidence (2.2%, 4.1%) was low for both age cohorts, compared with other locations. However, in European Caucasian children at age 12, the significantly higher prevalence of myopia in the younger sample suggests a rise in prevalence, consistent with international trends. Progression of myopia was similar for children of East Asian and European Caucasian ethnicity, but lower than reported in children of East Asian ethnicity in East Asia, suggesting that environmental differences may have some impact on progression.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522969     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  53 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of myopia.

Authors:  P J Foster; Y Jiang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [Epidemiology of myopia].

Authors:  S Hopf; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Eye shape using partial coherence interferometry, autorefraction, and SD-OCT.

Authors:  Christopher A Clark; Ann E Elsner; Benjamin J Konynenbelt
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Incidence of and Factors Associated With Myopia and High Myopia in Chinese Children, Based on Refraction Without Cycloplegia.

Authors:  Sean K Wang; Yangfeng Guo; Chimei Liao; Yanxian Chen; Guangxing Su; Guohui Zhang; Lei Zhang; Mingguang He
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Childhood myopia: epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention.

Authors:  Matthew Recko; Erin Durrie Stahl
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

7.  The influence of near work on myopic refractive change in urban students in Beijing: a three-year follow-up report.

Authors:  Zhong Lin; Balamurali Vasudevan; Guang Yun Mao; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Vishal Jhanji; Xiao Xia Li; Hong Jia Zhou; Ning Li Wang; Yuan Bo Liang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Citicoline retards myopia progression following form deprivation in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Junfeng Mao; Shuangzhen Liu; Chunyan Fu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-03-14

9.  Effect of High Add Power, Medium Add Power, or Single-Vision Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children: The BLINK Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Maria K Walker; Donald O Mutti; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Loraine T Sinnott; Amber Gaume Giannoni; Katherine M Bickle; Krystal L Schulle; Alex Nixon; Gilbert E Pierce; David A Berntsen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Auricular acupressure for myopia prevention and control in children and its effect on choroid and retina: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Rong Han; Xie-He Kong; Feng Zhao; Yan-Ting Yang; Xiao-Qing Dong; Li Zeng; Zhi Chen; Yue Zhao; Guang Yang; Jue Hong; Xing-Tao Zhou; Xiao-Peng Ma
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.