Literature DB >> 32780139

Effect of High Add Power, Medium Add Power, or Single-Vision Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children: The BLINK Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jeffrey J Walline1, Maria K Walker2, Donald O Mutti1, Lisa A Jones-Jordan1, Loraine T Sinnott1, Amber Gaume Giannoni2, Katherine M Bickle1, Krystal L Schulle2,3, Alex Nixon1,4, Gilbert E Pierce1, David A Berntsen2.   

Abstract

Importance: Slowing myopia progression could decrease the risk of sight-threatening complications. Objective: To determine whether soft multifocal contact lenses slow myopia progression in children, and whether high add power (+2.50 D) slows myopia progression more than medium (+1.50 D) add power lenses. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-masked randomized clinical trial that took place at 2 optometry schools located in Columbus, Ohio, and Houston, Texas. A total of 294 consecutive eligible children aged 7 to 11 years with -0.75 D to -5.00 D of spherical component myopia and less than 1.00 D astigmatism were enrolled between September 22, 2014, and June 20, 2016. Follow-up was completed June 24, 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to wear high add power (n = 98), medium add power (n = 98), or single-vision (n = 98) contact lenses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 3-year change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction, as measured by the mean of 10 autorefraction readings. There were 11 secondary end points, 4 of which were analyzed for this study, including 3-year eye growth.
Results: Among 294 randomized participants, 292 (99%) were included in the analyses (mean [SD] age, 10.3 [1.2] years; 177 [60.2%] were female; mean [SD] spherical equivalent refractive error, -2.39 [1.00] D). Adjusted 3-year myopia progression was -0.60 D for high add power, -0.89 D for medium add power, and -1.05 D for single-vision contact lenses. The difference in progression was 0.46 D (95% CI, 0.29-0.63) for high add power vs single vision, 0.30 D (95% CI, 0.13-0.47) for high add vs medium add power, and 0.16 D (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.33) for medium add power vs single vision. Of the 4 secondary end points, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 3 of the end points. Adjusted mean eye growth was 0.42 mm for high add power, 0.58 mm for medium add power, and 0.66 mm for single vision. The difference in eye growth was -0.23 mm (95% CI, -0.30 to -0.17) for high add power vs single vision, -0.16 mm (95% CI, -0.23 to -0.09) for high add vs medium add power, and -0.07 mm (95% CI, -0.14 to -0.01) for medium add power vs single vision. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children with myopia, treatment with high add power multifocal contact lenses significantly reduced the rate of myopia progression over 3 years compared with medium add power multifocal and single-vision contact lenses. However, further research is needed to understand the clinical importance of the observed differences. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02255474.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32780139      PMCID: PMC7420158          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.10834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  39 in total

1.  The effect of multifocal soft contact lenses on peripheral refraction.

Authors:  Pauline Kang; Yvonne Fan; Kelly Oh; Kevin Trac; Frank Zhang; Helen A Swarbrick
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A Randomized Trial of Soft Multifocal Contact Lenses for Myopia Control: Baseline Data and Methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Amber Gaume Giannoni; Loraine T Sinnott; Moriah A Chandler; Juan Huang; Donald O Mutti; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  A randomized trial of the effects of rigid contact lenses on myopia progression.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Lisa A Jones; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Peripheral defocus and myopia progression in myopic children randomly assigned to wear single vision and progressive addition lenses.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Christopher D Barr; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.

Authors:  Brien A Holden; Timothy R Fricke; David A Wilson; Monica Jong; Kovin S Naidoo; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Tien Y Wong; Thomas J Naduvilath; Serge Resnikoff
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Soft Contact Lenses with Positive Spherical Aberration for Myopia Control.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Jing Xu; Khaled Chehab; Joan Exford; Noel Brennan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Mohamed Hussein; Donald Everett; Thomas T Norton; Daniel Kurtz; M Cristina Leske; Ruth Manny; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Mitch Scheiman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Myopia Control with a Novel Peripheral Gradient Soft Lens and Orthokeratology: A 2-Year Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jaime Pauné; Hari Morales; Jesús Armengol; Lluisa Quevedo; Miguel Faria-Ribeiro; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lens slows myopia progression in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: a 2-year randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Carly Siu Yin Lam; Wing Chun Tang; Dennis Yan-Yin Tse; Ying Yung Tang; Chi Ho To
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Effect of low-addition soft contact lenses with decentered optical design on myopia progression in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Takashi Fujikado; Sayuri Ninomiya; Takuma Kobayashi; Asaki Suzaki; Mitsuhiko Nakada; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-23
View more
  35 in total

1.  The Effects of Center-near and Center-distance Multifocal Contact Lenses on Peripheral Defocus and Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Lea A Hair; Elaine M Steffensen; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.106

2.  Treatment zone decentration promotes retinal reshaping in Chinese myopic children wearing orthokeratology lenses.

Authors:  Xue Li; Yingying Huang; Jiali Zhang; Chenglu Ding; Yunyun Chen; Hao Chen; Jinhua Bao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  Myopia Control With Multifocal Lens in School-Aged Children: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meilan Chen; Lu Xu; Hongyang Li; Fengping Cai; Hao Wang; Chun Hu; Yi Wu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Efficacy of 0.01% atropine for myopia control in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial depends on baseline electroretinal response.

Authors:  Henry H L Chan; Kai Yip Choi; Alex L K Ng; Bonnie N K Choy; Jonathan Cheuk Hung Chan; Sonia S H Chan; Serena Z C Li; Wing Yan Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Myopia: Mechanisms and Strategies to Slow Down Its Progression.

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Alessandro Boldini; Davide Romano; Giuseppina Mazza; Stefano Bignotti; Francesco Morescalchi; Francesco Semeraro
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 1.974

Review 6.  Review on the Myopia Pandemic: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention.

Authors:  James R Landreneau; Nathan P Hesemann; Maggie A Cardonell
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

7.  Side effects of topical atropine 0.05% compared to 0.01% for myopia control in German school children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lutz Joachimsen; Navid Farassat; Tim Bleul; Daniel Böhringer; Wolf A Lagrèze; Michael Reich
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Axial length targets for myopia control.

Authors:  Paul Chamberlain; Percy Lazon de la Jara; Baskar Arumugam; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Visual Performance of Center-distance Multifocal Contact Lenses Fit Using a Myopia Control Paradigm.

Authors:  Hannah R Gregory; Augustine N Nti; James S Wolffsohn; David A Berntsen; Eric R Ritchey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  Greater higher order aberrations induced by toric orthokeratology versus soft toric multifocal contact lens wear.

Authors:  Erin S Tomiyama; Chuan Hu; Jason D Marsack; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.