Literature DB >> 21684207

Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.

Hormuzd A Katki1, Walter K Kinney, Barbara Fetterman, Thomas Lorey, Nancy E Poitras, Li Cheung, Franklin Demuth, Mark Schiffman, Sholom Wacholder, Philip E Castle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concurrent testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cytology (co-testing) is an approved alternative to cytology alone in women aged 30 years and older. We aimed to assess the safety in routine clinical practice of 3-year screening intervals for women testing negative for HPV with normal cytology and to assess if co-testing can identify women at high risk of cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or worse over 5 years.
METHODS: We assessed the 5-year cumulative incidence, starting in 2003-05, of cervical cancer and CIN3 or worse for 331,818 women aged 30 years and older who enrolled in co-testing at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (Berkeley, CA, USA) and had adequate enrolment co-test results. Follow-up continued until Dec 31, 2009. We defined cumulative incidence to include prevalence at enrolment and incidence after enrolment. Prevalence at enrolment was defined as the ratio of women diagnosed with each outcome on the biopsy visit immediately after their enrolment screening visit to the total enrolled women. At screening visits only HPV test and Pap smear samples were collected, and at biopsy visits colposcopically directed biopsies were taken. To estimate post-enrolment incidence, we used Weibull survival models.
FINDINGS: In 315,061 women negative by HPV testing, the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer was 3.8 per 100,000 women per year, slightly higher than for the 306,969 who were both negative by HPV and Pap testing (3.2 per 100,000), and half the cancer risk of the 319,177 who were negative by Pap testing (7.5 per 100,000). 313,465 (99.5%) women negative by HPV testing had either normal cytology or equivocal abnormalities. Abnormal cytology greatly increased cumulative incidence of CIN3 or worse over 5 years for the 16,757 positive by HPV testing (12.1%vs 5.9%; p<0.0001). By contrast, although statistically significant, abnormal cytology did not increase 5-year risk of CIN3 or worse for women negative by HPV testing to a substantial level (0.86%vs 0.16%; p=0.004). 12,208 (73%) of the women positive by HPV testing had no cytological abnormality, and these women had 258 (35%) of 747 CIN3 or adenocarcinoma in situ, [corrected] 25 (29%) of 87 cancers, and 17 (63%) of 27 adenocarcinomas.
INTERPRETATION: For women aged 30 years and older in routine clinical practice who are negative by co-testing (both HPV and cytology), 3-year screening intervals were safe because a single negative test for HPV was sufficient to reassure against cervical cancer over 5 years. Incorporating HPV testing with cytology also resulted in earlier identification of women at high risk of cervical cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. Testing for HPV without adjunctive cytology might be sufficiently sensitive for primary screening for cervical cancer. FUNDING: Intramural Research Program of the US National Cancer Institute/NIH/DHHS, and the American Cancer Society.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684207      PMCID: PMC3272857          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70145-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  47 in total

1.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.

Authors:  M M Manos; W K Kinney; L B Hurley; M E Sherman; J Shieh-Ngai; R J Kurman; J E Ransley; B J Fetterman; J S Hartinger; K M McIntosh; G F Pawlick; R A Hiatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark H Stoler; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Interlaboratory reliability of Hybrid Capture 2.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman; Cheri L Peyton
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 5.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Jose Jeronimo; Ana C Rodriguez; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; J Thomas Cox; Francisco Garcia; Sue Goldie; Kenneth Hatch; Kenneth L Noller; Nancy Roach; Carolyn Runowicz; Debbie Saslow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Pontus Naucler; Walter Ryd; Sven Törnberg; Anders Strand; Göran Wadell; Kristina Elfgren; Thomas Rådberg; Björn Strander; Bo Johansson; Ola Forslund; Bengt-Göran Hansson; Eva Rylander; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Eliane Duarte-Franco; Isabel Rodrigues; Stephen D Walter; James Hanley; Alex Ferenczy; Sam Ratnam; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Guglielmo Ronco; Jack Cuzick; Paola Pierotti; Maria Paola Cariaggi; Paolo Dalla Palma; Carlo Naldoni; Bruno Ghiringhello; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Daria Minucci; Franca Parisio; Ada Pojer; Maria Luisa Schiboni; Catia Sintoni; Manuel Zorzi; Nereo Segnan; Massimo Confortini
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-21

Review 10.  2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; L Stewart Massad; Charles J Dunton; Mark Spitzer; Edward J Wilkinson; Diane Solomon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  151 in total

1.  Comparison of the cobas Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test with the hybrid capture 2 and linear array HPV DNA tests.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Mark Sadorra; Brandon J Lamere; Randi Kail; Carrie Aldrich; Walter Kinney; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Gynecological cancer: More evidence supporting human papillomavirus testing.

Authors:  Philip E Castle
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Overview of the CDC Cervical Cancer (Cx3) Study: an educational intervention of HPV testing for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Mona Saraiya; April Greek; Nikki A Hawkins; Katherine B Roland; Diane Manninen; Donatus U Ekwueme; Jacqueline W Miller; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  From Papanicolaou to papillomaviruses: evolving challenges in cervical cancer screening in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Safaeian; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Xiaonan Xue; Li C Cheung; Julia C Gage; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas S Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Filling a gap in cervical cancer screening programmes.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Type-specific HPV and Pap test results among low-income, underserved women: providing insights into management strategies.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; April A Greek; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; L Stewart Massad; George F Sawaya; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  An ecological analysis of the incidence of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix in Hispanic women in the United States.

Authors:  Kristy K Ward; Angelica M Roncancio; Miguel Angel Cano; Steven C Plaxe
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.