Literature DB >> 23519304

Five-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ among women with HPV-positive and HPV-negative LSIL Pap results.

Hormuzd A Katki1, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Barbara Fetterman, Nancy E Poitras, Thomas Lorey, Li C Cheung, Tina Raine-Bennett, Julia C Gage, Walter K Kinney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Pap results do not typically lead to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. HPV triage is not cost-effective because most cases are HPV-positive. However, under new national guidelines recommending cotesting for women aged 30 to 64 years, clinicians will increasingly receive the HPV test result with LSIL Pap results. Some authors have suggested that HPV triage might be effective at older ages, when the percentage of HPV positivity among women with LSIL declines.
METHODS: We estimated 5-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ among 9,033 women aged 30 to 64 years who had both an HPV test and an LSIL Pap result.
RESULTS: HPV positivity among women with LSIL decreased only slightly with age (30 to 34 vs 60 to 64 years, 88% vs 72%, p < .0001). The 5-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ of women aged 30 to 64 years testing HPV-positive/LSIL were larger than those among women testing HPV-negative/LSIL (CIN 2+, 19% vs 5.1%, p < .0001; CIN 3+, 6.1% vs 2.0%, p<.0001). The 5-year risk of CIN 3+ in HPV-negative/LSIL women was similar to that for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) Pap test result without knowledge of HPV test results (2.0% vs 2.6%, p = .4).
CONCLUSIONS: HPV-negative/LSIL posed lower risk than other Pap results that guidelines currently recommend for referral to immediate colposcopy. By the principle of "equal management of equal risks," women with HPV-negative/LSIL might reasonably be managed similarly to those with ASC-US Pap results without knowledge of HPV testing, that is, retesting at 6 to 12 months, rather than immediate colposcopy. Although the HPV test result for LSIL Pap results provides actionable information to clinicians who screen with cotesting, the high HPV positivity of LSIL at even the oldest ages suggests the lack of cost-effectiveness of HPV triage of LSIL for clinicians who do not use routine cotesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519304      PMCID: PMC3637971          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182854269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  22 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.

Authors:  M H Stoler; M Schiffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  A comparison of the human papillomavirus test and Papanicolaou smear as a second screening method for women with minor cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Sonia Andersson; Lena Dillner; Kristina Elfgren; Miriam Mints; Maria Persson; Eva Rylander
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Age-related changes of the cervix influence human papillomavirus type distribution.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Jose Jeronimo; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Ana C Rodríguez; M Concepción Bratti; Allan Hildesheim; Sholom Wacholder; L Rodney Long; Leif Neve; Ruth Pfeiffer; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Diane Davey; Robert Kurman; Ann Moriarty; Dennis O'Connor; Marianne Prey; Stephen Raab; Mark Sherman; David Wilbur; Thomas Wright; Nancy Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Frank Buntinx; Marc Van Ranst; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Adjunctive human papillomavirus testing in the 2-year follow-up of women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Alice Lytwyn; John W Sellors; James B Mahony; Dean Daya; William Chapman; Michelle Howard; Paula Roth; Attila T Lorincz; Amiran Gafni; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Comparison between prototype hybrid capture 3 and hybrid capture 2 human papillomavirus DNA assays for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Attila T Lorincz; David R Scott; Mark E Sherman; Andrew G Glass; Brenda B Rush; Sholom Wacholder; Robert D Burk; M Michele Manos; John E Schussler; Paul Macomber; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

2.  Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Impact of age on the false negative rate of human papillomavirus DNA test in patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Kyu-Hee Won; Jae Yeon Lee; Hye-Yon Cho; Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Hong No; Yong-Beom Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-03-16

5.  A regression model for risk difference estimation in population-based case-control studies clarifies gender differences in lung cancer risk of smokers and never smokers.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kovalchik; Sara De Matteis; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil E Caporaso; Ravi Varadhan; Dario Consonni; Andrew W Bergen; Hormuzd A Katki; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Comparison of cervical cancer screening results among 256,648 women in multiple clinical practices.

Authors:  Amy J Blatt; Ronald Kennedy; Ronald D Luff; R Marshall Austin; Douglas S Rabin
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Minor Cytological Abnormalities and up to 7-Year Risk for Subsequent High-Grade Lesions by HPV Type.

Authors:  Maria Persson; K Miriam Elfström; Sven-Erik Olsson; Joakim Dillner; Sonia Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Risks of CIN 2+, CIN 3+, and Cancer by Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Status: The Foundation of Risk-Based Cervical Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Maria Demarco; Thomas S Lorey; Barbara Fetterman; Li C Cheung; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Walter K Kinney; Nancy E Poitras; Brian Befano; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  HPV Testing With 16, 18, and 45 Genotyping Stratifies Cancer Risk for Women With Normal Cytology.

Authors:  Mark H Stoler; Thomas C Wright; Valentin Parvu; Karen Yanson; Karen Eckert; Salma Kodsi; Charles Cooper
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jesper H Bonde; Maria-Teresa Sandri; Devin S Gary; Jeffrey C Andrews
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.