OBJECTIVE: Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Pap results do not typically lead to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. HPV triage is not cost-effective because most cases are HPV-positive. However, under new national guidelines recommending cotesting for women aged 30 to 64 years, clinicians will increasingly receive the HPV test result with LSIL Pap results. Some authors have suggested that HPV triage might be effective at older ages, when the percentage of HPV positivity among women with LSIL declines. METHODS: We estimated 5-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ among 9,033 women aged 30 to 64 years who had both an HPV test and an LSIL Pap result. RESULTS: HPV positivity among women with LSIL decreased only slightly with age (30 to 34 vs 60 to 64 years, 88% vs 72%, p < .0001). The 5-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ of women aged 30 to 64 years testing HPV-positive/LSIL were larger than those among women testing HPV-negative/LSIL (CIN 2+, 19% vs 5.1%, p < .0001; CIN 3+, 6.1% vs 2.0%, p<.0001). The 5-year risk of CIN 3+ in HPV-negative/LSIL women was similar to that for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) Pap test result without knowledge of HPV test results (2.0% vs 2.6%, p = .4). CONCLUSIONS: HPV-negative/LSIL posed lower risk than other Pap results that guidelines currently recommend for referral to immediate colposcopy. By the principle of "equal management of equal risks," women with HPV-negative/LSIL might reasonably be managed similarly to those with ASC-US Pap results without knowledge of HPV testing, that is, retesting at 6 to 12 months, rather than immediate colposcopy. Although the HPV test result for LSIL Pap results provides actionable information to clinicians who screen with cotesting, the high HPV positivity of LSIL at even the oldest ages suggests the lack of cost-effectiveness of HPV triage of LSIL for clinicians who do not use routine cotesting.
OBJECTIVE: Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Pap results do not typically lead to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. HPV triage is not cost-effective because most cases are HPV-positive. However, under new national guidelines recommending cotesting for women aged 30 to 64 years, clinicians will increasingly receive the HPV test result with LSIL Pap results. Some authors have suggested that HPV triage might be effective at older ages, when the percentage of HPV positivity among women with LSIL declines. METHODS: We estimated 5-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ among 9,033 women aged 30 to 64 years who had both an HPV test and an LSIL Pap result. RESULTS:HPV positivity among women with LSIL decreased only slightly with age (30 to 34 vs 60 to 64 years, 88% vs 72%, p < .0001). The 5-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ of women aged 30 to 64 years testing HPV-positive/LSIL were larger than those among women testing HPV-negative/LSIL (CIN 2+, 19% vs 5.1%, p < .0001; CIN 3+, 6.1% vs 2.0%, p<.0001). The 5-year risk of CIN 3+ in HPV-negative/LSIL women was similar to that for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) Pap test result without knowledge of HPV test results (2.0% vs 2.6%, p = .4). CONCLUSIONS:HPV-negative/LSIL posed lower risk than other Pap results that guidelines currently recommend for referral to immediate colposcopy. By the principle of "equal management of equal risks," women with HPV-negative/LSIL might reasonably be managed similarly to those with ASC-US Pap results without knowledge of HPV testing, that is, retesting at 6 to 12 months, rather than immediate colposcopy. Although the HPV test result for LSIL Pap results provides actionable information to clinicians who screen with cotesting, the high HPV positivity of LSIL at even the oldest ages suggests the lack of cost-effectiveness of HPV triage of LSIL for clinicians who do not use routine cotesting.
Authors: Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Philip E Castle; Jose Jeronimo; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Ana C Rodríguez; M Concepción Bratti; Allan Hildesheim; Sholom Wacholder; L Rodney Long; Leif Neve; Ruth Pfeiffer; Robert D Burk Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Diane Solomon; Diane Davey; Robert Kurman; Ann Moriarty; Dennis O'Connor; Marianne Prey; Stephen Raab; Mark Sherman; David Wilbur; Thomas Wright; Nancy Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marc Arbyn; Frank Buntinx; Marc Van Ranst; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Joakim Dillner Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-02-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Alice Lytwyn; John W Sellors; James B Mahony; Dean Daya; William Chapman; Michelle Howard; Paula Roth; Attila T Lorincz; Amiran Gafni; Stephen D Walter Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Philip E Castle; Attila T Lorincz; David R Scott; Mark E Sherman; Andrew G Glass; Brenda B Rush; Sholom Wacholder; Robert D Burk; M Michele Manos; John E Schussler; Paul Macomber; Mark Schiffman Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Julia C Gage; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Walter K Kinney Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephanie A Kovalchik; Sara De Matteis; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil E Caporaso; Ravi Varadhan; Dario Consonni; Andrew W Bergen; Hormuzd A Katki; Sholom Wacholder Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Amy J Blatt; Ronald Kennedy; Ronald D Luff; R Marshall Austin; Douglas S Rabin Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Maria Demarco; Thomas S Lorey; Barbara Fetterman; Li C Cheung; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Walter K Kinney; Nancy E Poitras; Brian Befano; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Mark H Stoler; Thomas C Wright; Valentin Parvu; Karen Yanson; Karen Eckert; Salma Kodsi; Charles Cooper Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 2.493