Literature DB >> 30576462

Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results.

Philip E Castle1, Walter K Kinney, Xiaonan Xue1, Li C Cheung1, Julia C Gage1, Nancy E Poitras1, Thomas S Lorey1, Hormuzd A Katki1, Nicolas Wentzensen1, Mark Schiffman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is caused by persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. US consensus management guidelines for a positive cervical screening result typically focus on the current screening result only. A negative testing history may alter risk of the following positive screening results, caused by a new HPV infection, and therefore its optimal management.
METHODS: Women ages 30 years and older were screened with triennial HPV and cytology co-testing at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2014. We estimated the subsequent 5-year risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more severe diagnoses (CIN3+) in a cohort of 1 156 387 women following abnormal (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US] or worse) cytology and/or positive HPV testing, when the test result followed 0 (n = 990 013), 1 (n = 543 986), 2 (n = 245 974), or 3 (n = 79 946) consecutive negative co-test(s). All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Following 0-3 successive negative co-tests, 5-year CIN3+ risks following a positive HPV test decreased progressively from 7.2% (95% CI = 7.0% to 7.4%) to 1.5% (95% CI = 0.7% to 3.4%) (Ptrend < .001). Similarly, risks following an abnormal (ASC-US or worse) cytology result decreased from 6.6% (95% CI = 6.4% to 6.9%) to 1.1% (95% CI = 0.5% to 2.3%) (Ptrend < .001). Risks following low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, the risk threshold for referral to colposcopy in the United States, decreased from 5.2% (95% CI = 4.7% to 5.7%) to 0.9% (95% CI = 0.2% to 4.3%). Risks following high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or more severe, a specific marker for the presence of precancerous lesions, decreased from 50.0% (95% CI = 47.5% to 52.5%) to 10.0% (95% CI = 2.6% to 34.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Following one or more sequential antecedent, documented negative co-tests or HPV tests, women with HPV-positive ASC-US or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion might have sufficiently low CIN3+ risk that they do not need colposcopy referral and might instead undergo 6-12-month surveillance for evidence of higher risk before being referred to colposcopy.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30576462      PMCID: PMC6695308          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  40 in total

1.  FLEXIBLE RISK PREDICTION MODELS FOR LEFT OR INTERVAL-CENSORED DATA FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.

Authors:  Noorie Hyun; Li C Cheung; Qing Pan; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance.

Authors:  Warner K Huh; Kevin A Ault; David Chelmow; Diane D Davey; Robert A Goulart; Francisco A R Garcia; Walter K Kinney; L Stewart Massad; Edward J Mayeaux; Debbie Saslow; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W Lawson; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Preparing for the Next Round of ASCCP-Sponsored Cervical Screening and Management Guidelines.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Michelle J Khan; Philip E Castle; David Chelmow; Warner K Huh; Anna Barbara Moscicki; Colleen K Stockdale; Teresa M Darragh; Michelle Silver; Richard S Guido
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence.

Authors:  Susanne K Kjær; Kirsten Frederiksen; Christian Munk; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Risk stratification in cervical cancer screening by complete screening history: Applying bioinformatics to a general screening population.

Authors:  Nicholas Baltzer; Karin Sundström; Jan F Nygård; Joakim Dillner; Jan Komorowski
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  A comparison of HPV DNA testing and liquid based cytology over three rounds of primary cervical screening: extended follow up in the ARTISTIC trial.

Authors:  Henry C Kitchener; Clare Gilham; Alexandra Sargent; Andrew Bailey; Rebecca Albrow; Christopher Roberts; Mina Desai; Jean Mather; Andrew Turner; Sue Moss; Julian Peto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  A 3-year interval is too short for re-screening women testing negative for human papillomavirus: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  M Zorzi; H Frayle; M Rizzi; C Fedato; M Rugge; M G Penon; A Bertazzo; S Callegaro; M Campagnolo; F Ortu; A Del Mistro
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  6 in total

1.  Overexpression of long non-coding RNA WT1-AS or silencing of PIK3AP1 are inhibitory to cervical cancer progression.

Authors:  Wenjuan Tong; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Contribution of Etiologic Cofactors to CIN3+ Risk Among Women With Human Papillomavirus-Positive Screening Test Results.

Authors:  Maria Demarco; Didem Egemen; Noorie Hyun; Xiaojian Chen; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Li Cheung; Olivia Carter-Pokras; Anne Hammer; Julia C Gage; Megan A Clarke; Philip E Castle; Brian Befano; Jie Chen; Cher Dallal; Xin He; Kanan Desai; Thomas Lorey; Nancy Poitras; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Rebecca B Perkins; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  The Improving Risk Informed HPV Screening (IRIS) Study: Design and Baseline Characteristics.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Tina Raine-Bennett; Mark Schiffman; Megan A Clarke; Li C Cheung; Nancy E Poitras; Nicole E Varnado; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip E Castle; Brian Befano; Malini Chandra; Greg Rydzak; Thomas Lorey; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.090

4.  Assessing 10-Year Safety of a Single Negative HPV Test for Cervical Cancer Screening: Evidence from FOCAL-DECADE Cohort.

Authors:  Anna Gottschlich; Dirk van Niekerk; Laurie W Smith; Lovedeep Gondara; Joy Melnikow; Darrel A Cook; Marette Lee; Gavin Stuart; Ruth E Martin; Stuart Peacock; Eduardo L Franco; Andrew Coldman; Mel Krajden; Gina Ogilvie
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Introduction of primary screening using high-risk HPV DNA detection in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Clare A Aitken; Heleen M E van Agt; Albert G Siebers; Folkert J van Kemenade; Hubert G M Niesters; Willem J G Melchers; Judith E M Vedder; Rob Schuurman; Adriaan J C van den Brule; Hans C van der Linden; John W J Hinrichs; Anco Molijn; Klaas J Hoogduin; Bettien M van Hemel; Inge M C M de Kok
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Didem Egemen; Xiaojian Chen; Hormuzd A Katki; Maria Demarco; Amy L Wiser; Rebecca B Perkins; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.842

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.