Literature DB >> 34138380

Obstetrical outcomes of ART pregnancies in patients with male factor infertility.

Isca Landesberg1, Anat Lavie2, Maya Ram1, Michal Yechieli3, Lee Reicher1, Ariel Many1, Sharon Morag4, Yonit Schechtman5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are associated with an increased incidence of obstetrical and neonatal complications. With the growing rate of male factor infertility, which is unique by not involving the maternal milieu, we aimed to assess whether obstetrical outcomes differed between IVF/ICSI pregnancies due to male factor infertility and those not due to male factor infertility.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women receiving IVF/ICSI treatments at a single hospital over a five-year period was involved in the study. Inclusion criteria were women with a viable pregnancy that delivered at the same hospital. Pregnancies were divided into male factor only related and non-male factor-related infertility. The groups were compared for several maternal and neonatal complications.
RESULTS: In total, 225 patients met the study criteria, with 94 and 131 pregnancies belonging to the male factor and non-male factor groups, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable, except for younger maternal age and higher incidence of twin pregnancies in the male factor group. A sub-analysis for singleton pregnancies revealed a less likelihood of cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and male gender offspring in the male factor group (p < 0.05). These differences were not observed in the sub-analysis for twin pregnancies. Other outcome measures were similar in both groups, both for singleton and twin pregnancies.
CONCLUSION: Singleton IVF pregnancies due to male factor infertility are associated with a reduced incidence of some adverse outcomes, likely due to lack of underlying maternal medical conditions or laboratory conditions related to ICSI. Our findings require validation by further studies on larger samples.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; In vitro fertilization; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Male factor infertility; Neonatal outcome; Pregnancy outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34138380      PMCID: PMC8417209          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02259-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  46 in total

1.  Childbirth education for multiple pregnancy: part 1: prenatal considerations.

Authors:  Kristen S Montgomery; Sabrina Cubera; Christie Belcher; David Patrick; Heather Funderburk; Christa Melton; Michelle Fastenau
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Bi Qin; Xiao-Qi Sheng; Di Wu; Shi-You Gao; Yi-Ping You; Tu-Bao Yang; Hua Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?

Authors:  T Perri; R Chen; R Yoeli; P Merlob; R Orvieto; Y Shalev; Z Ben-Rafael; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Offspring sex ratio of subfertile men and men with abnormal sperm characteristics.

Authors:  R Jacobsen; E Bostofte; N E Skakkebaek; J Hansen; H Moller
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States.

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Cynthia Ferre; Herbert B Peterson; Maurizio Macaluso; Meredith A Reynolds; Victoria C Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Jackson; Kimberly A Gibson; Yvonne W Wu; Mary S Croughan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Committee Opinion No 671: Perinatal Risks Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age.

Authors:  Keith T Jones
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Assisted reproductive technology pregnancy complications are significantly associated with endometriosis severity before conception: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fujii; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Takeshi Nagamatsu; Miyuki Harada; Tetsuya Hirata; Kaori Koga; Tomoyuki Fujii; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  RETIRED: Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Victoria M Allen; R Douglas Wilson; Anthony Cheung
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Placental histology and pregnancy complications following intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility.

Authors:  Hadas Ganer Herman; Alexander Volodarsky-Perel; Tuyet Nhung Ton Nu; Alexandre Machado-Gedeon; Yiming Cui; Jonathan Shaul; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.