Literature DB >> 34182957

Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Hui Ju Chih1, Flavia T S Elias1,2, Laura Gaudet1, Maria P Velez3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is one of the most common pregnancy complications and causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including HDP. However, the impact of multiple pregnancies, oocyte donation, as well as fresh and frozen embryo transfer needs to be further studied. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the association between ART and HDP or preeclampsia relative to spontaneous conception (SC).
METHODS: We identified studies from EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library (up to April 8, 2020) and manually using structured search strategies. Cohort studies that included pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without intracytoplasmic sperm fertilization (ICSI) relative to SC with HDP or preeclampsia as the outcome of interest were included. The control group was women who conceived spontaneously without ART or fertility medications. The pooled results were reported in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals based on random effects models. Numbers needed to harm (NNH) were calculated based on absolute risk differences between exposure and control groups.
RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were included after a screening of 1879 abstracts and 283 full text articles. Compared to SC, IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.60-1.80; I2 = 80%) and multiple pregnancies (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.20-1.50; I2 = 76%) were both associated with higher odds of HDP. Singleton pregnancies with oocyte donation had the highest odds of HDP out of all groups analyzed (OR 4.42; 95% CI 3.00-6.51; I2 = 83%). Frozen embryo transfer resulted in higher odds of HDP (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.58-1.92; I2 = 55%) than fresh embryo transfer (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.33-1.53; I2 = 72%). The associations between IVF/ICSI pregnancies and SC were similar for preeclampsia. Most interventions had an NNH of 40 to 100, while singleton and multiple oocyte donation pregnancies had particularly low NNH for HDP (16 and 10, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirmed that IVF/ICSI pregnancies are at higher odds of HDP and preeclampsia than SC, irrespective of the plurality. The odds were especially high in frozen embryo transfer and oocyte donation pregnancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; Fresh embryo transfer; Frozen embryo transfer; Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; In vitro fertilization; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Meta-analysis; Oocyte donation; Preeclampsia

Year:  2021        PMID: 34182957     DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03938-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  55 in total

Review 1.  Oocyte donation pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Pourya Masoudian; Ahmed Nasr; Joseph de Nanassy; Karen Fung-Kee-Fung; Shannon A Bainbridge; Dina El Demellawy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Indications for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  L Hamberger; K Lundin; A Sjögren; B Söderlund
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Jiabi Qin; Hua Wang; Xiaoqi Sheng; Desheng Liang; Hongzhuan Tan; Jiahui Xia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Short- and long-term outcomes in children born after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  A Pinborg
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Michael Tobias; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Introduction: Frozen 2: an update on cryopreserved embryo transfer in the era of vitrification.

Authors:  Richard J Paulson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shilpi Pandey; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Jackson; Kimberly A Gibson; Yvonne W Wu; Mary S Croughan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys.

Authors:  Maya N Mascarenhas; Seth R Flaxman; Ties Boerma; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Gretchen A Stevens
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Reza Omani-Samani; Maryam Mohammadi; Payam Amini; Behnaz Navid; Ahad Alizadeh; Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae; Saman Maroufizadeh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  7 in total

1.  Maternal-Perinatal Variables in Patients with Severe Preeclampsia Who Develop Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Patrocinio Rodríguez-Benitez; Irene Aracil Moreno; Cristina Oliver Barrecheguren; Yolanda Cuñarro López; Fátima Yllana; Pilar Pintado Recarte; Coral Bravo Arribas; Melchor Álvarez-Mon; Miguel A Ortega; Juan A De Leon-Luis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Effects of early maternal cancer and fertility treatment on the risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Cathrine Everhøj; Filippa Nyboe Norsker; Catherine Rechnitzer; Sofie de Fine Licht; Thomas T Nielsen; Susanne K Kjær; Allan Jensen; Marie Hargreave; Jane Christensen; Federica Belmonte; Stine Kjaer Urhoj; Katrine Strandberg-Larsen; Jeanette F Winther; Line Kenborg
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Caesarean birth in women with infertility: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  E Richmond; J G Ray; J Pudwell; M Djerboua; L Gaudet; M Walker; G N Smith; M P Velez
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 7.331

4.  Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin vs. singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Rui Gao; Yong Liu; Ke Zhao; Xiaolin Su; Hin Ching Wong; Luyao Li; Binbin Xie; Yuanyan Huang; Chuhui Qiu; Jiang He; Chaoqun Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 5.  Sex differences in hypertension. Do we need a sex-specific guideline?

Authors:  Renata Cífková; Larysa Strilchuk
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  A Prospective Study to Determine the Predictive Ability of HDP-Gestosis Score for the Development of Pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Meeta Gupta; Poonam Yadav; Farhana Yaqoob
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 7.  Local immune recognition of trophoblast in early human pregnancy: controversies and questions.

Authors:  Ashley Moffett; Norman Shreeve
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 108.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.