Literature DB >> 23515404

Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.

Daniel W Lin1, Lisa F Newcomb, Elissa C Brown, James D Brooks, Peter R Carroll, Ziding Feng, Martin E Gleave, Raymond S Lance, Martin G Sanda, Ian M Thompson, John T Wei, Peter S Nelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Active surveillance is used to manage low-risk prostate cancer. Both PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG are promising biomarkers that may be associated with aggressive disease. This study examines the correlation of these biomarkers with higher cancer volume and grade determined at the time of biopsy in an active surveillance cohort. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Urine was collected after digital rectal examination prospectively as part of the multi-institutional Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS). PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG levels were analyzed in urine collected at study entry. Biomarker scores were correlated to clinical and pathologic variables.
RESULTS: In 387 men, both PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG scores were significantly associated with higher volume disease. For a negative repeat biopsy, and 1% to 10%, 11% to 33%, 34% or more positive cores, median PCA3, and TMPRSS2:ERG scores increased incrementally (P < 0.005). Both PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG scores were also significantly associated with the presence of high-grade disease. For a negative repeat biopsy, Gleason 6 and Gleason ≥7 cancers, the median PCA3, and TMPRSS2:ERG scores also increased incrementally (P = 0.02 and P = 0.001, respectively). Using the marker scores as continuous variables, the ORs for a biopsy in which cancer was detected versus a negative repeat biopsy (ref) on modeling was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.07-1.85), P = 0.01 for PCA3 and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10-1.49), P = 0.001 for TMPRSS2:ERG.
CONCLUSIONS: For men on active surveillance, both PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG seem to stratify the risk of having aggressive cancer as defined by tumor volume or Gleason score. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23515404      PMCID: PMC3674574          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  44 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients.

Authors:  Michael Peyromaure; Vincent Ravery; Aurel Messas; Marianne Toublanc; Lilianne Boccon-Gibod; Laurent Boccon-Gibod
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  PCA3 molecular urine assay correlates with prostate cancer tumor volume: implication in selecting candidates for active surveillance.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakanishi; Jack Groskopf; Herbert A Fritsche; Viju Bhadkamkar; Amy Blase; S Vikas Kumar; John W Davis; Patricia Troncoso; Harry Rittenhouse; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Frederick Dorey; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Tumor length and location of cancer on biopsy predict for side specific extraprostatic cancer extension.

Authors:  Yoshio Naya; Joel W Slaton; Patricia Troncoso; Koji Okihara; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Morphology of prostate cancer: the effects of multifocality on histological grade, tumor volume and capsule penetration.

Authors:  G J Miller; J M Cygan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  DD3(PCA3)-based molecular urine analysis for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daphne Hessels; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Inge van Oort; Herbert F M Karthaus; Geert J L van Leenders; Bianca van Balken; Lambertus A Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Deborah P Lubeck; Maxwell V Meng; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Barbieri; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Baseline and longitudinal plasma caveolin-1 level as a biomarker in active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; John W Davis; Brian F Chapin; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Louis L Pisters; Neema Navai; Mary F Achim; Xuemei Wang; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Seungtaek Choi; Deborah Kuban; Patricia Troncoso; Sam Hanash; Timothy C Thompson; Jeri Kim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  The mutational landscape of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Barbieri; Chris H Bangma; Anders Bjartell; James W F Catto; Zoran Culig; Henrik Grönberg; Jun Luo; Tapio Visakorpi; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The importance of active surveillance, and immediate re-biopsy in low-risk prostate cancer: The largest series from Turkey.

Authors:  Göksel Bayar; Kaya Horasanlı; Hüseyin Acinikli; Orhan Tanrıverdi; Ayhan Dalkılıç; Serdar Arısan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

5.  Role for (11)C-choline PET in active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oleksandr Boychak; Larissa Vos; William Makis; Francois-Alexandre Buteau; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew Parliament; Alexander J B McEwan; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Identification and Partial Characterization of Two Populations of Prostasomes by a Combination of Dynamic Light Scattering and Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Davide Chiasserini; Michela Mazzoni; Federico Bordi; Simona Sennato; Federica Susta; Pier Luigi Orvietani; Luciano Binaglia; Carlo Alberto Palmerini
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 8.  Heterogeneity in active surveillance protocols worldwide.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter; Mark Schwartz; Angela Fagerlin; R Scott Braithwaite; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

9.  Prostate cancer: Predicting prostate biopsy results--PCA3 versus phi.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.