Literature DB >> 22808955

Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Timothy J Wilt1, Michael K Brawer, Karen M Jones, Michael J Barry, William J Aronson, Steven Fox, Jeffrey R Gingrich, John T Wei, Patricia Gilhooly, B Mayer Grob, Imad Nsouli, Padmini Iyer, Ruben Cartagena, Glenn Snider, Claus Roehrborn, Roohollah Sharifi, William Blank, Parikshit Pandya, Gerald L Andriole, Daniel Culkin, Thomas Wheeler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surgery versus observation for men with localized prostate cancer detected by means of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is not known.
METHODS: From November 1994 through January 2002, we randomly assigned 731 men with localized prostate cancer (mean age, 67 years; median PSA value, 7.8 ng per milliliter) to radical prostatectomy or observation and followed them through January 2010. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality.
RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 10.0 years, 171 of 364 men (47.0%) assigned to radical prostatectomy died, as compared with 183 of 367 (49.9%) assigned to observation (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.08; P=0.22; absolute risk reduction, 2.9 percentage points). Among men assigned to radical prostatectomy, 21 (5.8%) died from prostate cancer or treatment, as compared with 31 men (8.4%) assigned to observation (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.09; P=0.09; absolute risk reduction, 2.6 percentage points). The effect of treatment on all-cause and prostate-cancer mortality did not differ according to age, race, coexisting conditions, self-reported performance status, or histologic features of the tumor. Radical prostatectomy was associated with reduced all-cause mortality among men with a PSA value greater than 10 ng per milliliter (P=0.04 for interaction) and possibly among those with intermediate-risk or high-risk tumors (P=0.07 for interaction). Adverse events within 30 days after surgery occurred in 21.4% of men, including one death.
CONCLUSIONS: Among men with localized prostate cancer detected during the early era of PSA testing, radical prostatectomy did not significantly reduce all-cause or prostate-cancer mortality, as compared with observation, through at least 12 years of follow-up. Absolute differences were less than 3 percentage points. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program and others; PIVOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007644.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22808955      PMCID: PMC3429335          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  36 in total

1.  Quality of life and symptoms in a randomized trial of radiotherapy versus deferred treatment of localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  P Fransson; J E Damber; R Tomic; H Modig; G Nyberg; A Widmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Causes of death in elderly prostate cancer patients and in a comparison nonprostate cancer cohort.

Authors:  C J Newschaffer; K Otani; M K McDonald; L T Penberthy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml.

Authors:  Thomas A Stamey; Iain M Johnstone; John E McNeal; Arthur Y Lu; Cheryl M Yemoto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Stark; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference: role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; John M Barry; Wylie Burke; Nananda F Col; Phaedra S Corso; Everett Dodson; M Elizabeth Hammond; Barry A Kogan; Charles F Lynch; Lee Newcomer; Eric J Seifter; Janet A Tooze; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  James A Eastham; Michael W Kattan; Elyn Riedel; Colin B Begg; Thomas M Wheeler; Claudia Gerigk; Mithat Gonen; Victor Reuter; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.

Authors:  Jenny Donovan; Nicola Mills; Monica Smith; Lucy Brindle; Ann Jacoby; Tim Peters; Stephen Frankel; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-05

10.  Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study.

Authors:  Derek J Rosario; J Athene Lane; Chris Metcalfe; Jenny L Donovan; Andy Doble; Louise Goodwin; Michael Davis; James W F Catto; Kerry Avery; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-09
View more
  530 in total

1.  Are Elderly Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Overtreated? Exploring Heterogeneity in Survival Effects.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; John L Gore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  [Patterns of care of patients with localized prostate cancer in Germany: a health care study with focus on active surveillance].

Authors:  F K H Chun; A Becker; L A Kluth; D Seiler; D Schnell; M Fisch; M Graefen; L Weissbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Science and society: The influence of charities in the field of men's health.

Authors:  Dan Wood; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; L Egevad; M Amin; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; P A Humphrey; J I Epstein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  A diagnosis of prostate cancer and pursuit of active surveillance is not followed by weight loss: potential for a teachable moment.

Authors:  M A Liss; J M Schenk; A V Faino; L F Newcomb; H Boyer; J D Brooks; P R Carroll; A Dash; M D Fabrizio; M E Gleave; P S Nelson; M L Neuhouser; J T Wei; Y Zheng; J L Wright; D W Lin; I M Thompson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Natural history of small index lesions suspicious for prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: recommendations for interval imaging follow-up.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Barış Türkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Anthony N Hoang; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Lambros Stamatakis; Hong Truong; Jeffrey W Nix; Srinivas Vourganti; Kinzya B Grant; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Probability of an abnormal screening prostate-specific antigen result based on age, race, and prostate-specific antigen threshold.

Authors:  Roxanne Espaldon; Katharine A Kirby; Kathy Z Fung; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Kinzya B Grant; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Prostate cancer: surgery versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Gianluca Giannarini
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Prostate cancer screening characteristics in men with BRCA1/2 mutations attending a high-risk prevention clinic.

Authors:  Richard Walker; Alyssa Louis; Alejandro Berlin; Sheri Horsburgh; Robert G Bristow; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.