CONTEXT: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with marked variability in patient outcomes. Molecular characterization has revealed striking mutational heterogeneity that may underlie the variable clinical course of the disease. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we discuss the common genomic alterations that form the molecular basis of PCa, their functional significance, and the potential to translate this knowledge into patient care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reviewed the relevant literature, with a particular focus on recent studies on somatic alterations in PCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Advances in sequencing technology have resulted in an explosion of data regarding the mutational events underlying the development and progression of PCa. Heterogeneity is the norm; few abnormalities in specific genes are highly recurrent, but alterations in certain signaling pathways do predominate. These alterations include those in pathways known to affect tumorigenesis in a wide spectrum of tissues, such as the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/phosphatase and tensin homolog/Akt pathway, cell cycle regulation, and chromatin regulation. Alterations more specific to PCa are also observed, particularly gene fusions of ETS transcription factors and alterations in androgen signaling. Mounting data suggest that PCa can be subdivided based on a molecular profile of genetic alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Major advances have been made in cataloging the genomic alterations in PCa and understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. These findings raise the possibility that PCa could soon transition from being a poorly understood, heterogeneous disease with a variable clinical course to being a collection of homogenous subtypes identifiable by molecular criteria, associated with distinct risk profiles, and perhaps amenable to specific management strategies or targeted therapies.
CONTEXT: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with marked variability in patient outcomes. Molecular characterization has revealed striking mutational heterogeneity that may underlie the variable clinical course of the disease. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we discuss the common genomic alterations that form the molecular basis of PCa, their functional significance, and the potential to translate this knowledge into patient care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reviewed the relevant literature, with a particular focus on recent studies on somatic alterations in PCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Advances in sequencing technology have resulted in an explosion of data regarding the mutational events underlying the development and progression of PCa. Heterogeneity is the norm; few abnormalities in specific genes are highly recurrent, but alterations in certain signaling pathways do predominate. These alterations include those in pathways known to affect tumorigenesis in a wide spectrum of tissues, such as the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/phosphatase and tensin homolog/Akt pathway, cell cycle regulation, and chromatin regulation. Alterations more specific to PCa are also observed, particularly gene fusions of ETS transcription factors and alterations in androgen signaling. Mounting data suggest that PCa can be subdivided based on a molecular profile of genetic alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Major advances have been made in cataloging the genomic alterations in PCa and understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. These findings raise the possibility that PCa could soon transition from being a poorly understood, heterogeneous disease with a variable clinical course to being a collection of homogenous subtypes identifiable by molecular criteria, associated with distinct risk profiles, and perhaps amenable to specific management strategies or targeted therapies.
Authors: Sylvan C Baca; Davide Prandi; Michael S Lawrence; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Alessandro Romanel; Yotam Drier; Kyung Park; Naoki Kitabayashi; Theresa Y MacDonald; Mahmoud Ghandi; Eliezer Van Allen; Gregory V Kryukov; Andrea Sboner; Jean-Philippe Theurillat; T David Soong; Elizabeth Nickerson; Daniel Auclair; Ashutosh Tewari; Himisha Beltran; Robert C Onofrio; Gunther Boysen; Candace Guiducci; Christopher E Barbieri; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrey Sivachenko; Scott L Carter; Gordon Saksena; Douglas Voet; Alex H Ramos; Wendy Winckler; Michelle Cipicchio; Kristin Ardlie; Philip W Kantoff; Michael F Berger; Stacey B Gabriel; Todd R Golub; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; Olivier Elemento; Gad Getz; Francesca Demichelis; Mark A Rubin; Levi A Garraway Journal: Cell Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Sooryanarayana Varambally; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Ming Zhou; Terrence R Barrette; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Martin G Sanda; Debashis Ghosh; Kenneth J Pienta; Richard G A B Sewalt; Arie P Otte; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Nature Date: 2002-10-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lia Burkhardt; Sarah Fuchs; Antje Krohn; Sawinee Masser; Malte Mader; Martina Kluth; Frederik Bachmann; Hartwig Huland; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Sarah Minner; Guido Sauter; Hüseyin Sirma; Ronald Simon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Himisha Beltran; Roman Yelensky; Garrett M Frampton; Kyung Park; Sean R Downing; Theresa Y MacDonald; Mirna Jarosz; Doron Lipson; Scott T Tagawa; David M Nanus; Philip J Stephens; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Maureen T Cronin; Mark A Rubin Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Daniel W Lin; Lisa F Newcomb; Elissa C Brown; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Ziding Feng; Martin E Gleave; Raymond S Lance; Martin G Sanda; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Peter S Nelson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: James W F Catto; Antonio Alcaraz; Anders S Bjartell; Ralph De Vere White; Christopher P Evans; Susanne Fussel; Freddie C Hamdy; Olli Kallioniemi; Lourdes Mengual; Thorsten Schlomm; Tapio Visakorpi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Brett S Carver; Caren Chapinski; John Wongvipat; Haley Hieronymus; Yu Chen; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Vivek K Arora; Carl Le; Jason Koutcher; Howard Scher; Peter T Scardino; Neal Rosen; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Virpi H Laitinen; Tommi Rantapero; Daniel Fischer; Elisa M Vuorinen; Teuvo L J Tammela; Tiina Wahlfors; Johanna Schleutker Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: David Lorente; Joaquin Mateo; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Alan D Smith; Shahneen Sandhu; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Johann S de Bono Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Date: 2016
Authors: David J DeGraff; Magdalena M Grabowska; Tom C Case; Xiuping Yu; Mary K Herrick; William J Hayward; Douglas W Strand; Justin M Cates; Simon W Hayward; Nan Gao; Michael A Walter; Ralph Buttyan; Yajun Yi; Klaus H Kaestner; Robert J Matusik Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Ali H Alhasan; Alexander W Scott; Jia J Wu; Gang Feng; Joshua J Meeks; C Shad Thaxton; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher E Barbieri; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Seth P Lerner; Charles Swanton; Mark A Rubin Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 20.096