BACKGROUND: DD3(PCA3) is the most prostate cancer-specific gene described to date. To assess the clinical utility of DD3(PCA3) a time-resolved fluorescence-based, quantitative RT-PCR analysis for DD3(PCA3) was developed. METHODS: The diagnostic potential of DD3(PCA3) was determined by quantitative measurement of DD3(PCA3) transcripts in non-malignant and malignant prostate specimens. Moreover, DD3(PCA3) transcripts were determined quantitatively in urine sediments obtained after prostatic massage. A cohort of 108 men, admitted for prostate biopsies based on a PSA of >3ng/ml, was studied. RESULTS: Prostate tumors showed a 66-fold up-regulation of DD3(PCA3) (median 158.4.10(5) copies/microg tissue RNA) when compared to benign prostate tissue (median 2.4.10(5) copies/microg tissue RNA). This up-regulation was found in more than 95% of prostate cancer specimens studied. These data revealed that specimens with less than 10% of cancer cells could be accurately discriminated from non-cancer tissues. Hence, detection of a small fraction of prostate cancer cells in a background of normal cells seemed feasible. Therefore, this DD3(PCA3)-based RT-PCR assay was used for the identification of prostate cancer in urine sediments obtained after prostatic massage. From 108 men with a serum PSA value >3ng/ml, 24 men were shown to have prostate cancer upon biopsy. Of these 24 men, 16 were shown to be positive for DD3(PCA3), indicating a sensitivity of the assay of 67%. Furthermore, a negative predictive value of 90% was calculated. CONCLUSION: The quantitative RT-PCR assay for DD3(PCA3) described, bears great promise as a tool for molecular urine analysis. It has great potential in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. A multi-center study using this DD3(PCA3) assay can provide the basis for the utility of molecular diagnostics in clinical urological practice.
BACKGROUND:DD3(PCA3) is the most prostate cancer-specific gene described to date. To assess the clinical utility of DD3(PCA3) a time-resolved fluorescence-based, quantitative RT-PCR analysis for DD3(PCA3) was developed. METHODS: The diagnostic potential of DD3(PCA3) was determined by quantitative measurement of DD3(PCA3) transcripts in non-malignant and malignant prostate specimens. Moreover, DD3(PCA3) transcripts were determined quantitatively in urine sediments obtained after prostatic massage. A cohort of 108 men, admitted for prostate biopsies based on a PSA of >3ng/ml, was studied. RESULTS:Prostate tumors showed a 66-fold up-regulation of DD3(PCA3) (median 158.4.10(5) copies/microg tissue RNA) when compared to benign prostate tissue (median 2.4.10(5) copies/microg tissue RNA). This up-regulation was found in more than 95% of prostate cancer specimens studied. These data revealed that specimens with less than 10% of cancer cells could be accurately discriminated from non-cancer tissues. Hence, detection of a small fraction of prostate cancer cells in a background of normal cells seemed feasible. Therefore, this DD3(PCA3)-based RT-PCR assay was used for the identification of prostate cancer in urine sediments obtained after prostatic massage. From 108 men with a serum PSA value >3ng/ml, 24 men were shown to have prostate cancer upon biopsy. Of these 24 men, 16 were shown to be positive for DD3(PCA3), indicating a sensitivity of the assay of 67%. Furthermore, a negative predictive value of 90% was calculated. CONCLUSION: The quantitative RT-PCR assay for DD3(PCA3) described, bears great promise as a tool for molecular urine analysis. It has great potential in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. A multi-center study using this DD3(PCA3) assay can provide the basis for the utility of molecular diagnostics in clinical urological practice.
Authors: Bora Gurel; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Cheryl M Koh; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; William G Nelson; Angelo M De Marzo Journal: Adv Anat Pathol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Riina-Minna Väänänen; Hans Lilja; Leni Kauko; Pauliina Helo; Henna Kekki; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; Martti Nurmi; Kalle Alanen; Anders Bjartell; Kim Pettersson Journal: Urology Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.649