Literature DB >> 12228889

Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

William F Rosenberger1, Linda M Haines.   

Abstract

Phase I clinical trials are typically small, uncontrolled studies designed to determine a maximum tolerated dose of a drug which will be used in further testing. Two divergent schools have developed in designing phase I clinical trials. The first defines the maximum tolerated dose as a statistic computed from data, and hence it is identified, rather than estimated. The second defines the maximum tolerated dose as a parameter of a monotonic dose-response curve, and hence is estimated. We review techniques from both philosophies. The goal is to present these methods in a single package, to compare them from philosophical and statistical grounds, to hopefully clear up some common misconceptions, and to make a few recommendations. This paper is not a review of simulation studies of these designs, nor does it present any new simulations comparing these designs. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12228889     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  26 in total

Review 1.  Statistical issues in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Kenneth R Hess
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Web-based tools for finding optimal designs in biomedical studies.

Authors:  Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Parametric non-mixture cure models for schedule finding of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Changying A Liu; Thomas M Braun
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

6.  Incorporating individual and collective ethics into phase I cancer trial designs.

Authors:  Jay Bartroff; Tze Leung Lai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Bayesian Dose Finding for Combined Drugs with Discrete and Continuous Doses.

Authors:  Lin Huo; Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.728

8.  Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Moving a Carbohydrate Mimetic Peptide into the clinic.

Authors:  Issam Makhoul; Laura Hutchins; Peter D Emanuel; Angela Pennisi; Eric Siegel; Fariba Jousheghany; Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi; Thomas Kieber-Emmons
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Bayesian continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials infusing T cells with limited sample size.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Lei Feng; Ping Liu; Elizabeth J Shpall; Partow Kebriaei; Richard Champlin; Donald Berry; Laurence J N Cooper
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.