Literature DB >> 23494603

Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.

Woo Kyung Moon1, Chung-Ming Lo, Jung Min Chang, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Jeon-Hor Chen, Ruey-Feng Chang.   

Abstract

The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23494603      PMCID: PMC3824917          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  26 in total

1.  Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; Wonshik Han; Hye Ryoung Koo; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; In-Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Woo Suk Choi; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

Authors:  Oswald Graf; Thomas H Helbich; Gottfried Hopf; Claudia Graf; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Ji Young Lee; Dae Ryong Kang; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  The probably benign assessment.

Authors:  Jessica W T Leung; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).

Authors:  Wei-Chih Shen; Ruey-Feng Chang; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Jesneck; Joseph Y Lo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breast tumor classification using fuzzy clustering for breast elastography.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Shao-Chien Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Simone Schrading; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Hon J Yu; Yong Chu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  8 in total

1.  Incorporating texture features in a computer-aided breast lesion diagnosis system for automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Haixia Liu; Tao Tan; Jan van Zelst; Ritse Mann; Nico Karssemeijer; Bram Platel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-07-25

2.  Automatic classification of ultrasound breast lesions using a deep convolutional neural network mimicking human decision-making.

Authors:  Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; Matthias Eberhard; Magda Marcon; Anton S Becker; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The normal mode analysis shape detection method for automated shape determination of lung nodules.

Authors:  Joseph N Stember
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Classification of breast cancer in ultrasound imaging using a generic deep learning analysis software: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anton S Becker; Michael Mueller; Elina Stoffel; Magda Marcon; Soleen Ghafoor; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Differential diagnosis between small breast phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas using artificial intelligence and ultrasound data.

Authors:  Sihua Niu; Jianhua Huang; Jia Li; Xueling Liu; Dan Wang; Yingyan Wang; Huiming Shen; Min Qi; Yi Xiao; Mengyao Guan; Diancheng Li; Feifei Liu; Xiuming Wang; Yu Xiong; Siqi Gao; Xue Wang; Ping Yu; Jia'an Zhu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

6.  A Fusion-Based Approach for Breast Ultrasound Image Classification Using Multiple-ROI Texture and Morphological Analyses.

Authors:  Mohammad I Daoud; Tariq M Bdair; Mahasen Al-Najar; Rami Alazrai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Observer Variability in BI-RADS Ultrasound Features and Its Influence on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Masses.

Authors:  Laith R Sultan; Ghizlane Bouzghar; Benjamin J Levenback; Nauroze A Faizi; Santosh S Venkatesh; Emily F Conant; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Adv Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-09

8.  Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A.

Authors:  Sihua Niu; Jianhua Huang; Jia Li; Xueling Liu; Dan Wang; Ruifang Zhang; Yingyan Wang; Huiming Shen; Min Qi; Yi Xiao; Mengyao Guan; Haiyan Liu; Diancheng Li; Feifei Liu; Xiuming Wang; Yu Xiong; Siqi Gao; Xue Wang; Jiaan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.