Literature DB >> 29215311

Classification of breast cancer in ultrasound imaging using a generic deep learning analysis software: a pilot study.

Anton S Becker1, Michael Mueller1, Elina Stoffel1, Magda Marcon1, Soleen Ghafoor1, Andreas Boss1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To train a generic deep learning software (DLS) to classify breast cancer on ultrasound images and to compare its performance to human readers with variable breast imaging experience.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, all breast ultrasound examinations from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 at our institution were reviewed. Patients with post-surgical scars, initially indeterminate, or malignant lesions with histological diagnoses or 2-year follow-up were included. The DLS was trained with 70% of the images, and the remaining 30% were used to validate the performance. Three readers with variable expertise also evaluated the validation set (radiologist, resident, medical student). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: 82 patients with malignant and 550 with benign lesions were included. Time needed for training was 7 min (DLS). Evaluation time for the test data set were 3.7 s (DLS) and 28, 22 and 25 min for human readers (decreasing experience). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed non-significant differences (p-values 0.45-0.47) in the area under the curve of 0.84 (DLS), 0.88 (experienced and intermediate readers) and 0.79 (inexperienced reader).
CONCLUSION: DLS may aid diagnosing cancer on breast ultrasound images with an accuracy comparable to radiologists, and learns better and faster than a human reader with no prior experience. Further clinical trials with dedicated algorithms are warranted. Advances in knowledge: DLS can be trained classify cancer on breast ultrasound images high accuracy even with comparably few training cases. The fast evaluation speed makes real-time image analysis feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29215311      PMCID: PMC5965470          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  19 in total

1.  Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Chung-Ming Chen; Yi-Hong Chou; Ko-Chung Han; Guo-Shian Hung; Chui-Mei Tiu; Hong-Jen Chiou; See-Ying Chiou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability.

Authors:  Sun Mi Kim; Heon Han; Jeong Mi Park; Yoon Jung Choi; Hoi Soo Yoon; Jung Hee Sohn; Moon Hee Baek; Yoon Nam Kim; Young Moon Chae; Jeon Jong June; Jiwon Lee; Yong Hwan Jeon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Ultrasound Using Computerized BI-RADS Features and Machine Learning Methods.

Authors:  Juan Shan; S Kaisar Alam; Brian Garra; Yingtao Zhang; Tahira Ahmed
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  SonoNet: Real-Time Detection and Localisation of Fetal Standard Scan Planes in Freehand Ultrasound.

Authors:  Christian F Baumgartner; Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Jacqueline Matthew; Tara P Fletcher; Sandra Smith; Lisa M Koch; Bernhard Kainz; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Ultrasound RF time series for classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  Nishant Uniyal; Hani Eskandari; Purang Abolmaesumi; Samira Sojoudi; Paula Gordon; Linda Warren; Robert N Rohling; Septimiu E Salcudean; Mehdi Moradi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Megan J Lenihan; Jennifer Lieberman; Jessica Torrente
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required?

Authors:  Elisabetta Giannotti; Sarah Vinnicombe; Kim Thomson; Dennis McLean; Colin Purdie; Lee Jordan; Andy Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  38 in total

1.  Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning.

Authors:  Xuejun Qian; Jing Pei; Hui Zheng; Xinxin Xie; Lin Yan; Hao Zhang; Chunguang Han; Xiang Gao; Hanqi Zhang; Weiwei Zheng; Qiang Sun; Lu Lu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 2.  Deep learning in breast radiology: current progress and future directions.

Authors:  William C Ou; Dogan Polat; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Automatic classification of ultrasound breast lesions using a deep convolutional neural network mimicking human decision-making.

Authors:  Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; Matthias Eberhard; Magda Marcon; Anton S Becker; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Deep learning based detection of intracranial aneurysms on digital subtraction angiography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Nicolin Hainc; Manoj Mannil; Vaia Anagnostakou; Hatem Alkadhi; Christian Blüthgen; Lorenz Wacht; Andrea Bink; Shakir Husain; Zsolt Kulcsár; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-07-07

5.  Assessment of the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to interventional radiology treatments.

Authors:  Francesca Patella; Filippo Pesapane; Enrico Fumarola; Stefania Zannoni; Pietro Brambillasca; Ilaria Emili; Guido Costa; Victoria Anderson; Elliot B Levy; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Diagnostic Efficiency of the Breast Ultrasound Computer-Aided Prediction Model Based on Convolutional Neural Network in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Heqing Zhang; Lin Han; Ke Chen; Yulan Peng; Jiangli Lin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence applications for pediatric oncology imaging.

Authors:  Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

8.  Preliminary study on the application of deep learning system to diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome on CT images.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Kise; Haruka Ikeda; Takeshi Fujii; Motoki Fukuda; Yoshiko Ariji; Hiroshi Fujita; Akitoshi Katsumata; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Usefulness of a deep learning system for diagnosing Sjögren's syndrome using ultrasonography images.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Kise; Mayumi Shimizu; Haruka Ikeda; Takeshi Fujii; Chiaki Kuwada; Masako Nishiyama; Takuma Funakoshi; Yoshiko Ariji; Hiroshi Fujita; Akitoshi Katsumata; Kazunori Yoshiura; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Oncology.

Authors:  Brian D'Amore; Sara Smolinski-Zhao; Dania Daye; Raul N Uppot
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.