Literature DB >> 19000868

Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI.

Ke Nie1, Jeon-Hor Chen, Hon J Yu, Yong Chu, Orhan Nalcioglu, Min-Ying Su.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility using quantitative morphology/texture features of breast lesions for diagnostic prediction, and to explore the association of computerized features with lesion phenotype appearance on magnetic resonance imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three malignant/28 benign lesions were used in this study. A systematic approach from automated lesion segmentation, quantitative feature extraction, diagnostic feature selection using an artificial neural network (ANN), and lesion classification was carried out. Eight morphologic parameters and 10 gray level co-occurrence matrix texture features were obtained from each lesion. The diagnostic performance of selected features to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Six features were selected by an ANN using leave-one-out cross validation, including compactness, normalized radial length entropy, volume, gray level entropy, gray level sum average, and homogeneity. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.86. When dividing the database into half training and half validation set, a classifier of five features selected in the half training set achieved an area under the curve of 0.82 in the other half validation set. The selected morphology feature "compactness" was associated with shape and margin in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon, round shape and smooth margin for the benign lesions, and more irregular shape for the malignant lesions. The selected texture features were associated with homogeneous/heterogeneous patterns and the enhancement intensity. The malignant lesions had higher intensity and broader distribution on the enhancement histogram (more heterogeneous) compared to the benign lesions.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative analysis of morphology/texture features of breast lesions was feasible, and these features could be selected by an ANN to form a classifier for differential diagnosis. Establishing the link between computer-based features and visual descriptors defined in the BI-RADS lexicon will provide the foundation for the acceptance of quantitative diagnostic features in the development of computer-aided diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000868      PMCID: PMC2791407          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  27 in total

1.  Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Li Lan; Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  P F Liu; J F Debatin; R F Caduff; G Kacl; E Garzoli; G P Krestin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency.

Authors:  W E Polakowski; D A Cournoyer; S K Rogers; M P DeSimio; D W Ruck; J W Hoffmeister; R A Raines
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; N Petrick; M A Helvie; K L Lam; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  A T Stavros; D Thickman; C L Rapp; M A Dennis; S H Parker; G A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging.

Authors:  H Mumtaz; M A Hall-Craggs; T Davidson; K Walmsley; W Thurell; M W Kissin; I Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors.

Authors:  R M Rangayyan; N M El-Faramawy; J E Desautels; O A Alim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Carl J Vyborny; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.

Authors:  K Schelfout; M Van Goethem; E Kersschot; C Colpaert; A M Schelfhout; P Leyman; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; J Van Den Haute; J P Gillardin; W Tjalma; J C Van Der Auwera; P Buytaert; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  85 in total

1.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  A Karahaliou; K Vassiou; N S Arikidis; S Skiadopoulos; T Kanavou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification.

Authors:  Shannon C Agner; Salil Soman; Edward Libfeld; Margie McDonald; Kathleen Thomas; Sarah Englander; Mark A Rosen; Deanna Chin; John Nosher; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-based biomarkers of therapeutic response in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel I Golden; Jafi A Lipson; Melinda L Telli; James M Ford; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  A new quantitative image analysis method for improving breast cancer diagnosis using DCE-MRI examinations.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis classification of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S A Waugh; C A Purdie; L B Jordan; S Vinnicombe; R A Lerski; P Martin; A M Thompson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The MR radiomic signature can predict preoperative lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jinrong Qu; Chen Shen; Jianjun Qin; Zhaoqi Wang; Zhenyu Liu; Jia Guo; Hongkai Zhang; Pengrui Gao; Tianxia Bei; Yingshu Wang; Hui Liu; Ihab R Kamel; Jie Tian; Hailiang Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  3D multi-parametric breast MRI segmentation using hierarchical support vector machine with coil sensitivity correction.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Glen Morrell; Marta E Heibrun; Allison Payne; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Algorithm-based method for detection of blood vessels in breast MRI for development of computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Muqing Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Dustin Newell; Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Hon J Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.