Literature DB >> 17581897

Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

Oswald Graf1, Thomas H Helbich, Gottfried Hopf, Claudia Graf, Edward A Sickles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine whether nonpalpable solid breast masses that were partially or completely obscured at mammography and diagnosed as probably benign only at ultrasonography (US) can be safely managed with follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics committee approved this study; informed consent was not required. In 409 women, 448 nonpalpable solid masses were identified and classified as probably benign at US; at mammography these masses were either partially or completely obscured by dense fibroglandular tissue. Of the 448 masses, 445 were followed up, while biopsy was performed after initial imaging in the remaining three. False-negative rates, negative predictive values (NPVs), and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Of the 445 masses, 442 remained stable at follow-up (range, 2-5 years; mean, 3.3 years). Two masses increased (fibroadenomas at biopsy). One mass became palpable, and cancer was diagnosed at biopsy. The three masses in which initial biopsy was performed were fibroadenomas. The false-negative rate was 0.2% (one of 448; NPV, 99.8%; 95%CI: 0.0%, 1.23%).
CONCLUSION: Follow-up US appears to be an acceptable alternative to biopsy for solid masses with benign morphologic features seen at US owing to the extremely high NPV (99.8%). (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17581897     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441060258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Amy Lynn Conners; Carrie B Hruska; Cindy L Tortorelli; Robert W Maxwell; Deborah J Rhodes; Judy C Boughey; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Clinical breast concerns in low-risk pediatric patients: practice review with proposed recommendations.

Authors:  Linda M Sanders; Pinky Sharma; Miriam El Madany; Alexander B King; Koren S Goodman; Alison Esteva Sanders
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27

3.  Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi; Hak Hee Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 1. Solid circumscribed masses.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Can Cut-Off-Values for Tumor Size or Patient Age in Breast Ultrasound Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies or is it all About Bi-rads?- A Retrospective Analysis of 763 Biopsied T1-Sized Lesions.

Authors:  Laura Holzer-Fruehwald; Matthias Meissnitzer; Michael Weber; Stephan Holzer; Klaus Hergan; Christian Weismann
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Breast diseases in children: the spectrum of radiologic findings in a cohort study.

Authors:  Emel Durmaz; Murat Alp Öztek; Hatice Arıöz Habibi; Uğur Kesimal; Hakkı Timur Sindel
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Ultrasonography alone for diagnosis of breast cancer in women under 40.

Authors:  D C Appleton; L Hackney; S Narayanan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.