Literature DB >> 23483527

Interlingual lexical competition in a spoken sentence context: evidence from the visual world paradigm.

Evelyne Lagrou1, Robert J Hartsuiker, Wouter Duyck.   

Abstract

We used the visual world paradigm to examine interlingual lexical competition when Dutch-English bilinguals listened to low-constraining sentences in their nonnative (L2; Experiment 1) and native (L1; Experiment 2) languages. Additionally, we investigated the influence of the degree of cross-lingual phonological similarity. When listening in L2, participants fixated more on competitor pictures of which the onset of the name was phonologically related to the onset of the name of the target in the nontarget language (e.g., fles, "bottle", given target flower) than on phonologically unrelated distractor pictures. Even when they listened in L1, this effect was also observed when the onsets of the names of the target picture (in L1) and the competitor picture (in L2) were phonologically very similar. These findings provide evidence for interlingual competition during the comprehension of spoken sentences, both in L2 and in L1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483527     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0405-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

2.  Falling on sensitive ears: constraints on bilingual lexical activation.

Authors:  Min Ju; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-05

3.  WordGen: a tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French.

Authors:  Wouter Duyck; Timothy Desmet; Lieven P C Verbeke; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

4.  Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.

Authors:  Craig G Chambers; Hilary Cooke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.

Authors:  J E Andruski; S E Blumstein; M Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-09

7.  Latency for saccadic eye movement.

Authors:  M G Saslow
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-08

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context.

Authors:  Eva Van Assche; Wouter Duyck; Robert J Hartsuiker; Kevin Diependaele
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-22

10.  Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition.

Authors:  Béryl Schulpen; Ton Dijkstra; Herbert J Schriefers; Mark Hasper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bilinguals Show Weaker Lexical Access During Spoken Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Matthew Goldrick; Caroline Engstler; Viorica Marian
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-12

2.  Form Overrides Meaning When Bilinguals Monitor for Errors.

Authors:  Iva Ivanova; Victor S Ferreira; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Mixing Languages during Learning? Testing the One Subject-One Language Rule.

Authors:  Eneko Antón; Guillaume Thierry; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hands Down: Cognate Effects Persist During Written Word Production.

Authors:  Evy Woumans; Robin Clauws; Wouter Duyck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.