Literature DB >> 14640836

Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition.

Béryl Schulpen1, Ton Dijkstra, Herbert J Schriefers, Mark Hasper.   

Abstract

How do bilinguals recognize interlingual homophones? In a gating study, word identification and language membership decisions by Dutch-English bilinguals were delayed for interlingual homophones relative to monolingual controls. At the same time, participant judgments were sensitive to subphonemic cues. These findings suggest that auditory lexical access is language nonselective but is sensitive to language-specific characteristics of the input. In 2 cross-modal priming experiments, visual lexical decision times were shortest for monolingual controls preceded by their auditory equivalents. Response times to interlingual homophones accompanied by their corresponding auditory English or Dutch counterparts were also shorter than in unrelated conditions. However, they were longer than in the related monolingual control conditions, providing evidence for online competition of the 2 near-homophonic representations. Experiment 3 suggested that participants used sublexical cues to differentiate the 2 versions of a homophone after language nonselective access. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14640836     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Olga V Boukrina
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-05

2.  Interlingual lexical competition in a spoken sentence context: evidence from the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Evelyne Lagrou; Robert J Hartsuiker; Wouter Duyck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  Towards a distributed connectionist account of cognates and interlingual homographs: evidence from semantic relatedness tasks.

Authors:  Eva D Poort; Jennifer M Rodd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Modulation of Cross-Language Activation During Bilingual Auditory Word Recognition: Effects of Language Experience but Not Competing Background Noise.

Authors:  Melinda Fricke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Shaving Bridges and Tuning Kitaraa: The Effect of Language Switching on Semantic Processing.

Authors:  Suzanne C A Hut; Alina Leminen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-29

6.  Language selective or non-selective in bilingual lexical access? It depends on lexical tones!

Authors:  Xin Wang; Bronson Hui; Siyu Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.