Literature DB >> 23483359

Quantitative liver ADC measurements using diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla: evaluation of reproducibility and perfusion dependence using different techniques for respiratory compensation.

Nis Elbrønd Larsen1, Søren Haack, Lars Peter Skovgaard Larsen, Erik Morre Pedersen.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver suffers from low signal to noise making 3 Tesla (3 T) an attractive option, but 3 T data is scarce. It was the aim to study the influence of different b values and respiratory compensation methods (RCM) on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) level and on ADC reproducibility at 3 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 12 patients with malignant liver lesions underwent repeated (2-22 days) breathhold, free-breathing and respiratory triggered DWI at 3 T using b values between 0 and 1,000 s/mm(2).
RESULTS: The ADCs changed up to 150% in healthy livers and up to 48% in malignant lesions depending on b value combinations. Best ADC reproducibility in healthy livers were obtained with respiratory triggering (95% limits of agreement: ±0.12) and free-breathing (±0.14). In malignant lesions equivalent reproducibility was obtained with less RCM dependence. The use of a lower maximum b value (b = 500) decreased reproducibility (±0.14 to ±0.32) in both normal liver and malignant lesions.
CONCLUSION: Large differences in absolute ADC values and reproducibility caused by varying combinations of clinically realistic b values were demonstrated. Different RCMs caused smaller differences. Lowering maximum b value to 500 increased limits of agreement up to a factor of two. Serial ADC changes larger than approximately 15% can be detected confidently on an individual basis in both malignant lesions and normal liver parenchyma at 3 T using appropriate b values and respiratory compensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483359     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-013-0375-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  36 in total

1.  Characterization of small (≤10 mm) focal liver lesions: value of respiratory-triggered echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Konstantin Holzapfel; Melanie Bruegel; Matthias Eiber; Carl Ganter; Tibor Schuster; Petra Heinrich; Ernst J Rummeny; Jochen Gaa
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.

Authors:  Adam C Braithwaite; Brian M Dale; Daniel T Boll; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver at 3.0 Tesla using TRacking Only Navigator echo (TRON): a feasibility study.

Authors:  Marko K Ivancevic; Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Tetsuo Ogino; Hero K Hussain; Peter S Liu; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver.

Authors:  Petra G Kele; Eric J van der Jagt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Predicting response of colorectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; Erica Scurr; David Collins; Baris Kanber; Andrew Norman; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The effect of simultaneous use of respiratory triggering in diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Nasu; Yoshifumi Kuroki; Ryuzo Sekiguchi; Shigeru Nawano
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Tejas Parikh; Stephen J Drew; Vivian S Lee; Samson Wong; Elizabeth M Hecht; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Harsh Kandpal; Raju Sharma; K S Madhusudhan; Kulwant Singh Kapoor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  13 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of diffusion tensor imaging of the liver at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Marta Maieron; Giovanni Lissandrello; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Evaluation of simultaneous-multislice diffusion-weighted imaging of liver at 3.0 T with different breathing schemes.

Authors:  Yigang Pei; Siming Xie; Wenzheng Li; Xianjing Peng; Qin Qin; Qian Ye; Mengsi Li; Jiaxi Hu; Jiale Hou; Guijing Li; Shuo Hu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

Review 3.  Advances in diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mannelli; Stephanie Nougaret; Hebert A Vargas; Richard K G Do
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Free-Breathing Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Respiratory Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Radar-Trigger Technique: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Xinyue Liang; Zhenghong Bi; Chun Yang; Ruofan Sheng; Xinyuan Xia; Zheng Zhang; Yongming Dai; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Scan time minimization in hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of the simultaneous multislice acceleration technique with different acceleration factors and gradient preparation schemes.

Authors:  Jana Taron; Petros Martirosian; Nina F Schwenzer; Michael Erb; Thomas Kuestner; Jakob Weiß; Ahmed Othman; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Schraml
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cancer: Reported apparent diffusion coefficients, in-vitro and in-vivo reproducibility.

Authors:  Maysam M Jafar; Arman Parsai; Marc E Miquel
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

7.  The Accuracy of ADC Measurements in Liver Is Improved by a Tailored and Computationally Efficient Local-Rigid Registration Algorithm.

Authors:  Hossein Ragheb; Neil A Thacker; Jean-Marie Guyader; Stefan Klein; Nandita M deSouza; Alan Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification in Determining the Histological Diagnosis of Malignant Liver Lesions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Drevelegas; Katerina Nikiforaki; Manolis Constantinides; Nickolas Papanikolaou; Lavrentios Papalavrentios; Ioanna Stoikou; Paul Zarogoulidis; Georgia Pitsiou; Athanasia Pataka; John Organtzis; Eleni Papadaki; Konstantinos Porpodis; Ioanna Kougioumtzi; Ioannis Kioumis; Constantinos Kouskouras; Evaggelos Akriviadis; Antonios Drevelegas
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Does Delayed-Time-Point Imaging Improve 18F-FDG-PET in Patients With MALT Lymphoma?: Observations in a Series of 13 Patients.

Authors:  Marius E Mayerhoefer; Chiara Giraudo; Daniela Senn; Markus Hartenbach; Michael Weber; Ivo Rausch; Barbara Kiesewetter; Christian J Herold; Marcus Hacker; Matthias Pones; Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp; Leonhard Müllauer; Werner Dolak; Julius Lukas; Markus Raderer
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.794

10.  A data-driven statistical model that estimates measurement uncertainty improves interpretation of ADC reproducibility: a multi-site study of liver metastases.

Authors:  Ryan Pathak; Hossein Ragheb; Neil A Thacker; David M Morris; Houshang Amiri; Joost Kuijer; Nandita M deSouza; Arend Heerschap; Alan Jackson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.