Literature DB >> 23482920

Predictors of colorectal cancer testing using the California Health Inventory Survey.

Alexandra Modiri1, Kian Makipour, Javier Gomez, Frank Friedenberg.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify key variables associated with colon cancer testing using the 2009 California Health Inventory Survey (CHIS).
METHODS: The CHIS has been conducted biennially since 2001 using a two-stage, geographically stratified random-digit-dial sample design to produce a representative sample of the entire State. For this study we used survey data from 2001-2009 inclusive. We restricted our analysis to White, Black, and Hispanic/Latinos aged 50-80 years. Weighted data was used to calculate the proportion of participants who underwent some form of colon cancer testing (colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy or fecal occult blood testing) within the previous 5 years stratified by race/ethnicity. For inferential analysis, boot-strapping with replacement was performed on the weighted sample to attain variance estimates at the 95%CI. For mean differences among categories we used t-tests and for comparisons of categorical data we used Pearson's χ(2). Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent variables associated with undergoing some form of testing. Trend analysis was performed to determine rates of testing over the study period stratified by race.
RESULTS: The CHIS database for 2009 had 30 857 unique respondents corresponding to a weighted sample size of 10.6 million Californians. Overall, 63.0% (63.0-63.1) underwent a colon cancer test within the previous 5 years; with 70.5% (70.5%-70.6%) of this subset having undergone colonoscopy. That is 44.5% (44.4%-44.5%) of all individuals 50-80 underwent colonoscopy. By multivariable regression, those tested were more likely to be male (OR = 1.06; 95%CI: 1.06-1.06), Black (OR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.30-1.31), have a family member with colon cancer (OR = 1.71; 95%CI: 1.70-1.72), and have health insurance (OR = 2.71; 95%CI: 2.70-2.72). Progressive levels above the poverty line were also associated with receiving a test (100%-199%: 1.21; 1.20-1.21), (200%-299%:1.41; 1.40-1.42), (> 300:1.69; 1.68-1.70). The strongest variable was physician recommendation (OR = 3.90; 95%CI: 3.88-3.91). For the Hispanic/Latino group, additional variables associated with testing were success of physician-patient communication (OR = 2.44; 95%CI: 2.40-2.48) and naturalized citizenship status (OR = 1.91; 95%CI: 1.89-1.93). Trend analysis demonstrated increased colon cancer testing for all racial/ethnic subgroups from 2001-2009 although the rate remained considerably lower for the Hispanic/Latino subgroup.
CONCLUSION: Using CHIS we identified California citizens most likely to undergo colon cancer testing. The strongest variable associated with testing for all groups was physician recommendation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California Health Inventory Survey; Colon cancer testing; Colonoscopy; Hispanic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23482920      PMCID: PMC3587481          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i8.1247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

Review 1.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors.

Authors:  J A Shapiro; L C Seeff; M R Nadel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The influence of sociocultural factors on colonoscopy and FOBT screening adherence among low-income Hispanics.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf; Jennie Ellison; Cristina Villagra; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-08

5.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States.

Authors:  George N Ioannou; Michael K Chapko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effect of fecal occult blood testing on mortality from colorectal cancer. A case-control study.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Colorectal cancer screening disparities related to obesity and gender.

Authors:  Allison B Rosen; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Overweight, obesity, and colorectal cancer screening: disparity between men and women.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; David B Allison; Kevin R Fontaine
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Association Between Primary Source of Healthcare Coverage and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among US Veterans.

Authors:  Folasade P May; Elizabeth M Yano; Dawn Provenzale; W Neil Steers; Donna L Washington
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Colonoscopic Examination of Individuals With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher V Almario; Folasade P May; Ninez A Ponce; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Patient Navigation After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results Increases Diagnostic Colonoscopy and Highlights Multilevel Barriers to Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vivy T Cusumano; Anthony Myint; Edgar Corona; Liu Yang; Jennifer Bocek; Antonio G Lopez; Marcela Zhou Huang; Naveen Raja; Anna Dermenchyan; Lily Roh; Maria Han; Daniel Croymans; Folasade P May
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Jamie S Ostroff; Katherine N DuHamel; Thomas A D'Agostino; Marisol Hernandez; Mollie R Canzona; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Lower Adherence: A Description of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barrier Talk.

Authors:  Megan Johnson Shen; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Thomas A D'Agostino; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-12-04

6.  Availability of Healthcare Resources and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Among Non-Hispanic White and Non-Hispanic Black Adults.

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; John W Waterbor; Maria Pisu; Justin Xavier Moore; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-04

7.  The impact of preventive screening resource distribution on geographic and population-based disparities in colorectal cancer in Mississippi.

Authors:  Fazlay S Faruque; Xu Zhang; Elizabeth N Nichols; Denae L Bradley; Royce Reeves-Darby; Vonda Reeves-Darby; Roy J Duhé
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-08

8.  Palliative chemotherapy among people living in poverty with metastasised colon cancer: facilitation by primary care and health insurance.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Emma Bartfay; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Isaac N Luginaah; Guangyong Zou; Eric J Holowaty; Nancy L Richter; Madhan K Balagurusamy
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.633

9.  Colon cancer care and survival: income and insurance are more predictive in the USA, community primary care physician supply more so in Canada.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Guangyong Zou; Eric J Holowaty; Nancy L Richter
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-10-29

10.  Engaging traditional medicine providers in colorectal cancer screening education in a chinese american community: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Adam Burke; Janice Y Tsoh; Gem M Le; Susan Stewart; Ginny Gildengorin; Ching Wong; Elaine Chow; Kent Woo; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.