Kevin M Gorey1, Emma Bartfay2, Sindu M Kanjeekal3, Frances C Wright4,5, Caroline Hamm3, Isaac N Luginaah6, Guangyong Zou7, Eric J Holowaty8, Nancy L Richter1, Madhan K Balagurusamy1. 1. School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Oncology, Windsor Regional Cancer Center and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Departments of Surgery and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 8. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many Americans with metastasised colon cancer do not receive indicated palliative chemotherapy. We examined the effects of health insurance and physician supplies on such chemotherapy in California. METHODS: We analysed registry data for 1199 people with metastasised colon cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed for 1 year. We obtained data on health insurance, census tract-based socioeconomic status and county-level physician supplies. Poor neighbourhoods were oversampled and the criterion was receipt of chemotherapy. Effects were described with rate ratios (RR) and tested with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Palliative chemotherapy was received by less than half of the participants (45%). Facilitating effects of primary care (RR=1.23) and health insurance (RR=1.14) as well as an impeding effect of specialised care (RR=0.86) were observed. Primary care physician (PCP) supply took precedence. Adjusting for poverty, PCP supply was the only significant and strong predictor of chemotherapy (OR=1.62, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.56). The threshold for this primary care advantage was realised in communities with 8.5 or more PCPs per 10 000 inhabitants. Only 10% of participants lived in such well-supplied communities. CONCLUSIONS: This study's observations of facilitating effects of primary care and health insurance on palliative chemotherapy for metastasised colon cancer clearly suggested a way to maximise Affordable Care Act (ACA) protections. Strengthening America's system of primary care will probably be the best way to ensure that the ACA's full benefits are realised. Such would go a long way towards facilitating access to palliative care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Many Americans with metastasised colon cancer do not receive indicated palliative chemotherapy. We examined the effects of health insurance and physician supplies on such chemotherapy in California. METHODS: We analysed registry data for 1199 people with metastasised colon cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed for 1 year. We obtained data on health insurance, census tract-based socioeconomic status and county-level physician supplies. Poor neighbourhoods were oversampled and the criterion was receipt of chemotherapy. Effects were described with rate ratios (RR) and tested with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Palliative chemotherapy was received by less than half of the participants (45%). Facilitating effects of primary care (RR=1.23) and health insurance (RR=1.14) as well as an impeding effect of specialised care (RR=0.86) were observed. Primary care physician (PCP) supply took precedence. Adjusting for poverty, PCP supply was the only significant and strong predictor of chemotherapy (OR=1.62, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.56). The threshold for this primary care advantage was realised in communities with 8.5 or more PCPs per 10 000 inhabitants. Only 10% of participants lived in such well-supplied communities. CONCLUSIONS: This study's observations of facilitating effects of primary care and health insurance on palliative chemotherapy for metastasised colon cancer clearly suggested a way to maximise Affordable Care Act (ACA) protections. Strengthening America's system of primary care will probably be the best way to ensure that the ACA's full benefits are realised. Such would go a long way towards facilitating access to palliative care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemotherapy; Colon cancer; Health insurance; Palliative care; Poverty; Primary care physicians
Authors: Rosemary D Cress; Alan M Zaslavsky; Dee W West; Robert E Wolf; Martha C Felter; John Z Ayanian Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Thomas Rice; Lynn Y Unruh; Pauline Rosenau; Andrew J Barnes; Richard B Saltman; Ewout van Ginneken Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Guangyong Zou; Eric J Holowaty; Nancy L Richter Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2015-10-29
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Sundus Haji-Jama; Emma Bartfay; Isaac N Luginaah; Frances C Wright; Sindu M Kanjeekal Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-03-22 Impact factor: 2.655