Literature DB >> 15061742

Colorectal cancer screening disparities related to obesity and gender.

Allison B Rosen1, Eric C Schneider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with a higher incidence of colorectal cancer and increased colorectal cancer mortality. Obese women are less likely to undergo breast and cervical cancer screening than nonobese women. It is not known whether obesity is associated with a lower likelihood of colorectal cancer screening.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there is an association between body mass index (BMI) and rates of colorectal cancer screening. To examine whether BMI-related disparities in colorectal cancer screening differ between men and women. DESIGN AND
SETTING: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a cross-sectional random-digit telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state health departments in the 50 states and Washington, DC in 1999. PATIENTS: Survey respondents (N= 52886) between 51 and 80 years of age representing 64563332 U.S. adults eligible for colorectal cancer screening. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Adjusted rates of self-reported colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood testing within the past year or endoscopic screening (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) within the past 5 years.
RESULTS: The colorectal cancer screening rate was 43.8% overall. The rate of screening by FOBT within the last year or endoscopic screening within the past 5 years was 39.5% for the morbidly obese group, 45.0% for the obese group, 44.3% for the overweight group, and 43.5% for the normal weight group. The difference in screening rates was entirely attributable to differences in BMI among women. After statistical adjustment for potential confounders, morbidly obese women were less likely than normal weight women to be screened (adjusted rate difference, -5.6%; 95% confidence interval, -8.5 to -2.6). Screening rates among normal weight, overweight, and obese women, and among men in different weight groups did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening rates among age-eligible persons in the U.S. are disturbingly low. Morbidly obese women, who are at higher risk than others to develop and to die from colorectal cancer, are less likely to be screened. Efforts to increase colorectal cancer screening are needed for all age-eligible groups, but should also include targeted screening of morbidly obese women since they could reap substantial clinical benefits from screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061742      PMCID: PMC1492191          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  42 in total

1.  Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a 1997 survey of Massachusetts internists.

Authors:  P C Schroy; A C Geller; M Crosier Wood; M Page; L Sutherland; L J Holm; T Heeren
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Body weight and health care among women in the general population.

Authors:  K R Fontaine; M S Faith; D B Allison; L J Cheskin
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

4.  Etiology, prevention, and treatment of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; M Oken
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  1998-05

5.  American Gastroenterology Association issues guidelines for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  Leisure-time physical activity, body size, and colon cancer in women. Nurses' Health Study Research Group.

Authors:  M E Martínez; E Giovannucci; D Spiegelman; D J Hunter; W C Willett; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-07-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Associations of sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, and diabetes with the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L Le Marchand; L R Wilkens; L N Kolonel; J H Hankin; L C Lyu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Body size and the risk of colon cancer in a large case-control study.

Authors:  B J Caan; A O Coates; M L Slattery; J D Potter; C P Quesenberry; S M Edwards
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1998-02

9.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; E Funkhouser; M N Fouad; D S May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  42 in total

1.  Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1975-2006.

Authors:  Peter N Abotchie; Sally W Vernon; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Automated telephone calls improved completion of fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  David M Mosen; Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David H Smith; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; Michael Kositch; Thomas Hickey; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Richard H Fortinsky; Alison Kleppinger; Amanda B Merz-Beyus; Charles G Huntington; Suzanne Lagarde
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Factors that increase risk of colon polyps.

Authors:  Sarah W Grahn; Madhulika G Varma
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

5.  Association between self-reported depression and screening colonoscopy participation.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Janine Bacic; Lewis E Kazis; Howard Cabral
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

6.  Obesity and colorectal cancer screening among black and white adults.

Authors:  Sarah S Cohen; Harvey J Murff; Lisa B Signorello; William J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Greg Cooper; George Divine; Nancy Oja-Tebbe; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-09-17

8.  Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance.

Authors:  Amanda Condon; Lesley Graff; Lawrence Elliot; Alexandra Ilnyckyj
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Predictors of colorectal cancer testing using the California Health Inventory Survey.

Authors:  Alexandra Modiri; Kian Makipour; Javier Gomez; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Race moderates the relationship between obesity and colorectal cancer screening in women.

Authors:  Lucia A Leone; Marci K Campbell; Jessie A Satia; J Michael Bowling; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.