Literature DB >> 29793977

The Interplay Between Spike-Time and Spike-Rate Modes in the Auditory Nerve Encodes Tone-In-Noise Threshold.

Antoine Huet1, Gilles Desmadryl1, Thomas Justal1, Régis Nouvian1, Jean-Luc Puel1, Jérôme Bourien2.   

Abstract

Auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) encode pure tones through two modes of coding, spike time and spike rate, depending on the tone frequency. In response to a low-frequency tone, ANF firing is phase locked to the sinusoidal waveform. Because time coding vanishes with an increase in the tone frequency, high-frequency tone coding relies on the spike rate of the ANFs. Adding a continuous broadband noise to a tone compresses the rate intensity function of ANFs and shifts its dynamic range toward higher intensities. Therefore, the ANFs with high-threshold/low-spontaneous rate (SR) are thought to contribute to behavioral tone detection in noise. However, this theory relies on the discharge rate of the ANFs. The direct comparison with the masking threshold through spike timing, irrespective of the spontaneous rate, has not so far been investigated. Taking advantage of a unique proxy to quantify the spike synchrony (i.e., the shuffle autocorrelogram), we show in female gerbils that high-SR ANFs are more adapted to encode low-frequency thresholds through temporal code, giving them a strong robustness in noise. By comparing behavioral thresholds measured using prepulse inhibition of the acoustical startle reflex with population thresholds calculated from ANFs pooled per octave band, we show that threshold-based spike timing provides a better estimate of behavioral thresholds in the low-frequency range, whereas the high-frequency behavioral thresholds rely on the spiking rate, particularly in noise. This emphasizes the complementarity of temporal and rate modes to code tone-in-noise thresholds over a large range of frequencies.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT There is a general agreement that high-threshold/low-spontaneous rate (SR) auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) are of prime importance for tone detection in noise. However, this theory is based on the discharge rate of the fibers. Comparing the behavioral thresholds and single ANF thresholds shows that this is only true in the high-frequency range of tone stimulations. In the low-frequency range of tones (up to 2.7 kHz in the gerbil), the most sensitive ANFs (high-SR fibers) carry neural information through a spike-timing mode, even for noise in which tones do not induce a noticeable increment in the spike rate. This emphasizes the interplay between spike-time and spike-rate modes in the auditory nerve to encode tone-in-noise threshold over a large range of tone frequencies.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/385727-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory nerve; noisy environments; rate coding; temporal coding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29793977      PMCID: PMC6595976          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3103-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  57 in total

1.  Calcium dependence of exocytosis and endocytosis at the cochlear inner hair cell afferent synapse.

Authors:  D Beutner; T Voets; E Neher; T Moser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Correlation index: a new metric to quantify temporal coding.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Dries H Louage; Liesbeth Cardoen; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Ying-Yee Kong; Henry J Michalewski; Arnold Starr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Ion flow in cochlear hair cells and the regulation of hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Robert Patuzzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis.

Authors:  A Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reflex inhibition procedures for animal audiometry: a technique for assessing ototoxicity.

Authors:  J S Young; L D Fechter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ten(HL)-test results and psychophysical tuning curves for subjects with auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  8 in total

1.  Phase Locking of Auditory-Nerve Fibers Reveals Stereotyped Distortions and an Exponential Transfer Function with a Level-Dependent Slope.

Authors:  Adam J Peterson; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Understanding degraded speech leads to perceptual gating of a brainstem reflex in human listeners.

Authors:  Heivet Hernández-Pérez; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; David McAlpine; Sumitrajit Dhar; Sriram Boothalingam; Jessica J M Monaghan; Catherine M McMahon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Distinct neuronal types contribute to hybrid temporal encoding strategies in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Xiao-Ping Liu; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 9.593

4.  Peristimulus Time Responses Predict Adaptation and Spontaneous Firing of Auditory-Nerve Fibers: From Rodents Data to Humans.

Authors:  Antoine Huet; Charlène Batrel; Xavier Dubernard; Jean-Charles Kleiber; Gilles Desmadryl; Frédéric Venail; M Charles Liberman; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jérôme Bourien
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Temporal Coding of Single Auditory Nerve Fibers Is Not Degraded in Aging Gerbils.

Authors:  Amarins N Heeringa; Lichun Zhang; Go Ashida; Rainer Beutelmann; Friederike Steenken; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Encoding sound in the cochlea: from receptor potential to afferent discharge.

Authors:  Mark A Rutherford; Henrique von Gersdorff; Juan D Goutman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Strain Comparison in Rats Differentiates Strain-Specific from More General Correlates of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.

Authors:  L Koch; B H Gaese; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-18

8.  Theoretical Relationship Between Two Measures of Spike Synchrony: Correlation Index and Vector Strength.

Authors:  Dominik Kessler; Catherine E Carr; Jutta Kretzberg; Go Ashida
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.