Literature DB >> 11785815

Multicomponent stimulus interactions observed in basilar-membrane vibration in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea.

W S Rhode1, A Recio.   

Abstract

Multicomponent stimuli consisting of two to seven tones were used to study suppression of basilar-membrane vibration at the 3-4-mm region of the chinchilla cochlea with a characteristic frequency between 6.5 and 8.5 kHz. Three-component stimuli were amplitude-modulated sinusoids (AM) with modulation depth varied between 0.25 and 2 and modulation frequency varied between 100 and 2000 Hz. For five-component stimuli of equal amplitude, frequency separation between adjacent components was the same as that used for AM stimuli. An additional manipulation was to position either the first, third, or fifth component at the characteristic frequency (CF). This allowed the study of the basilar-membrane response to off-CF stimuli. CF suppression was as high as 35 dB for two-tone combinations, while for equal-amplitude stimulus components CF suppression never exceeded 20 dB. This latter case occurred for both two-tone stimuli where the suppressor was below CF and for multitone stimuli with the third component=CF. Suppression was least for the AM stimuli, including when the three AM components were equal. Maximum suppression was both level- and frequency dependent, and occurred for component frequency separations of 500 to 600 Hz. Suppression decreased for multicomponent stimuli with component frequency spacing greater than 600 Hz. Mutual suppression occurred whenever stimulus components were within the compressive region of the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11785815     DOI: 10.1121/1.1416198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

2.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking of sounds by a background noise--cochlear mechanical correlates.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

5.  Basilar membrane responses to tones and tone complexes: nonlinear effects of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Corstiaen P C Versteegh; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-31

6.  The spatial buildup of compression and suppression in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Corstiaen P C Versteegh; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21

7.  Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Nicole E Sieck; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Probing hair cell's mechano-transduction using two-tone suppression measurements.

Authors:  Wenxiao Zhou; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.